Comparative Study of Overdentures Retained by Cylindrical and Conical Telescopic Attachments in cases with few Remaining Teeth
Not Applicable
- Conditions
- Patients with few remaining teeth
- Registration Number
- JPRN-UMIN000028680
- Lead Sponsor
- Damascus University
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Complete: follow-up complete
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 30
Inclusion Criteria
Not provided
Exclusion Criteria
1. Remaining teeth with considerable mobility 2. Remaining teeth with severe bone loss 3. Remaining teeth are not distributed in both sides of jaw
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method 1. Masticatory efficiency 2. Some periodontal indicators (PD, CAL, abutment teeth mobility, alveolar bone loss)
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method 1. Dentures underlying mucosa evaluation 2. Technical failure rates 3. Abutments other evaluations 4. Patient satisfaction
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
What are the mechanical advantages of cylindrical vs. conical telescopic attachments in overdentures for edentulous patients?
How does telescopic attachment overdenture retention compare to standard ball or bar systems in patients with few remaining teeth?
Which biomarkers predict long-term success of overdentures with telescopic attachments in patients with limited dentition?
What are the common adverse events associated with telescopic attachment overdentures and their management strategies?
What are the clinical outcomes of conical telescopic attachments versus cylindrical in overdenture therapy for edentulous patients?