NL-OMON25027尚未招募不适用
Oral Fosfomycin versus Ciprofloxacin for Febrile Urinary Tract Infection in Men: a pilot study
Haga Teaching Hospital0 个研究点目标入组 30 人开始时间: 待定最近更新:
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 尚未招募
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 30
研究概览
简要总结
暂无简介。
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
入排标准
入选标准
- •1.Competent male patient aged 18 years or above
- •2.One or more symptom(s) suggestive of urinary tract infection (dysuria, frequency or urgency*; perineal or suprapubic pain; costo-vertebral tenderness or flank pain)
排除标准
- •1.Known allergy to fosfomycin or ciprofloxacin
- •2.Patients with known polycystic kidney disease
研究者
相似试验
进行中（未招募）
1 期
Oral Fosfomycin versus Ciprofloxacin for Febrile Urinary Tract Infection in Men: a pilot studyEUCTR2017-004963-11-NLHaga Teaching Hospital30
招募中
3 期
Oral Fosfomycin versus Ciprofloxacin for Febrile Urinary Tract Infection in Men: a pilot studyurinary tract infectionNL-OMON55825HagaZiekenhuis30
招募中
不适用
Oral Fosfomycin versus Ciprofloxacin for Febrile Urinary Tract Infection in Men: a pilot studyrinary tract infectionsNL-OMON22870one30
已完成
不适用
Study comparing the efficacy of fosfomycin and ciprofloxacin antibiotics in the antibiotic prophylaxis of transrectal prostate biopsyprostatiteC01.915RBR-9tk9pwzniversidade Federal do Paraná - Campus Toledo
已完成
不适用
Comparison of Fosfomycin versus Ciprofloxacin in the initial management of uncomplicated UTICTRI/2017/09/009922niversity College of Medical Sciences120