Home-Based Integrated Post-Acute Care Program for Hip Fracture
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 41
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Pain intensity Using the numerical pain rating scale (NPRS)
研究概览
简要总结
Background and purpose: Hip fracture, a common injury occurred in people aged over 50, may result in disability, poor quality of life, and higher care stress for their families. Aging population and growing number of hip fractures have increased medical expenses, so developed countries implemented post-acute care (PAC) to reduce acute hospitalization, and to improve the quality of care. PAC services can be delivered by hospital/facility-based and home-based services. Previous studies showed that both services could significantly improve patients' activities of daily living and quality of life, and reduce readmissions, long-term care and costs. Taiwan has implemented PAC plan for hip fractures since 2017, but relevant evidences are limited. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to analyze the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of PAC for patients with hip fractures.
详细描述
Methods: This is a prospective cohort study which will recruit patients aged over 50 with hip fractures receiving surgical treatment in the Taipei City Hospital. They will be provided home-based PAC, hospital-based PAC, or no formal PAC based on the medical judgment and patients/families' willingness. The period of PAC will be two to three weeks after the acute hospitalization. Assessments include physical function (30 seconds sit to stand, Barthel index, and Harris Hip Score), numerical pain rating scale, EuroQol instrument (EQ-5D), Caregiver Strain Index, and using of medical resources. The assessments will be on the day before discharge from acute hospitalization, and on the discharge day from post-acute care. The follow-up assessment will be at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after operation. The cost-effectiveness ratio will be defined as the New Taiwan dollars paid for 1-unit improvement of functional performance and quality of life.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Non Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 50 Years 至 —（Adult, Older Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •First hip fracture
- •Stable medical condition
排除标准
- •Hip fracture caused by major trauma or pathological condition
- •Multiple fractures
- •Severe physical disability before the hip fracture
- •Unable to cooperate with treatment
- •Further inpatient treatment
结局指标
主要结局
Pain intensity Using the numerical pain rating scale (NPRS)
时间窗: within 1 year
Using the numerical pain rating scale (NPRS) to measure participants' pain intensity. Ask participants to report their pain intensity with the 11-point scale (from 0 no pain to 10 worst possible pain).
Activities of daily living Using the Barthel Index (BI)
时间窗: within 1 year
Using the Barthel Index (BI) to measure participants' activities of daily living. The self-care domain is self-report by the patient or their families. The mobility domain is observed by the assessor. The greater score indicates more independence.
Functional performance of hip Using the Harris hip score (HHS)
时间窗: within 1 year
Using the Harris hip score (HHS) to measure participants' functional performance of hip. The pain domain is self-report by the patient. The function, deformity, and range of motion domain are observed by the assessor. The greater score indicates the better functional performance of hip.
Caregiver strain Using the caregiver strain index (CSI)
时间窗: within 1 year
Using the caregiver strain index (CSI) to measure the strain of caregiver. Ask them to fill a 13-item questionnaire. Greater value indicates a higher strain.
30-second sit to stand
时间窗: within 1 year
Ask participants to cross their arms at the chest, and to perform sit to stand as more as possible within 30 seconds. Measure the repetitions the participants do. Higher repetition indicates more strength of lower extremities.
Medical Costs
时间窗: within 1 year
Ask participants to record their direct medical cost and indirect medical cost within one year after hip fracture.
Quality of lives Using the EuroQol instrument (EQ-5D)
时间窗: within 1 year
Part 1: Ask participants to measure their mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression with the 3-point scale. The greater score indicates poor quality of life.
次要结局
未报告次要终点
研究者
Shih-Liang Shih
Director of Orthopedics
Taipei City Hospital