"Music Therapy in the Recovery Process of Individuals With Severe Mental Disorder in the Community Setting: A Pilot Study."
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 12
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- WHOQOL-BREF - Quality of Life Scale
研究概览
简要总结
The aim of this study was to analyze the effect of music therapy on hope, quality of life, and social functioning in individuals with Severe Mental Disorder in the community.
The main research questions were:
Can music therapy increase the level of hope in individuals with Severe Mental Disorder? Can music therapy improve the quality of life of individuals with Severe Mental Disorder? Can music therapy enhance the social functioning of individuals with Severe Mental Disorder?
Participants were users of a Community Mental Health Care Team called the Assertive Community Treatment Team.
A total of 12 music therapy sessions were conducted, each lasting 45-60 minutes. Participants selected the songs or sounds they wanted to listen to based on the session theme, followed by a dialogue between the participant and the nurse.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Na
- 干预模型
- Single Group
- 主要目的
- Supportive Care
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 16 Years 至 —（Child, Adult, Older Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Individuals aged 16 years or older.
- •Individuals without severe hearing impairment.
- •Individuals without cognitive deficits that would prevent them from reading or understanding the study documents.
排除标准
- •Having a severe hearing impairment.
- •Inability to read or understand the proposed questionnaires.
研究组 & 干预措施
Individuals with Severe Mental Disorder from an Assertive Community Treatment Team
The study was conducted within a community-based service for individuals with Severe Mental Disorder, called the Assertive Community Treatment Team (ACT Team), located in the city of Cartagena, Spain.
The study participants were active users currently receiving care from this service.
干预措施: Passive music therapy in an individual format (Behavioral)
结局指标
主要结局
WHOQOL-BREF - Quality of Life Scale
时间窗: This questionnaire was administered at three time points: at baseline (Day 1 of the intervention), at mid-intervention (around Week 10), and at the end of the intervention (Week 20)
This self-administered questionnaire assesses an individual's quality of life across four domains (physical health, psychological health, social relationships, and environment). It also includes an evaluation of perceived general health and overall quality of life. The questionnaire consists of 26 items with five response options (1-5). The higher the score in each domain, the better the quality of life profile of the person being assessed.
Beck Hopelessness Scale (BHS)
时间窗: This questionnaire was administered at three time points: at baseline (Day 1 of the intervention), at mid-intervention (around Week 10), and at the end of the intervention (Week 20).
This self-administered questionnaire assesses an individual's negative perceptions about the future and suicide risk. It consists of 20 items with true/false response options. The results indicate four levels of hopelessness: 0-3 (normal/asymptomatic), 4-8 (mild), 9-14 (moderate), and 15-20 (severe).
Social Functioning Scale (SFS)
时间窗: This questionnaire was administered at three time points: at baseline (Day 1 of the intervention), at mid-intervention (around Week 10), and at the end of the intervention (Week 20).
The self-administered version of this scale assesses seven dimensions of social functioning: Social isolation: 0 to 3 per item, with a total score range of 0-15. Interpersonal behavior: 4 items. First, items 1 and 2 are summed; if their combined score exceeds 3, a maximum of 3 is assigned. The remaining two items are scored from 0 to 3, resulting in a total score range of 0-9. Prosocial activities: 22 items, scored 0 to 3, total score range 0-66. Leisure: 15 items, scored 0 to 3, total score range 0-45. Independence-performance: 13 items, scored 0 to 3, total score range 0-39. Independence-competence: 13 items, scored 1 to 3, total score range 13-39. Employment/occupation: A score of up to 6 points is possible if the patient feels capable of performing some type of work and is making frequent attempts to find employment. It includes 78 items. Higher scores consistently indicate a higher level of social functioning in each domain.
次要结局
- Satisfaction with the received intervention(At the end of the intervention, in Week 20.)
研究者
Alejando Vargas Rubio
Mental Health Nurse Specialist
Universidad de Murcia