Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT02412735
NCT02412735
Completed
Phase 3

A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of a Single Injection of Rexlemestrocel-L Alone or Combined With Hyaluronic Acid (HA) in Subjects With Chronic Low Back Pain

Mesoblast, Ltd.48 sites in 2 countries404 target enrollmentMarch 6, 2015

Overview

Phase
Phase 3
Intervention
Rexlemestrocel-L
Conditions
Degenerative Disc Disease
Sponsor
Mesoblast, Ltd.
Enrollment
404
Locations
48
Primary Endpoint
Overall Treatment Success: Bayesian Estimated Response Rate
Status
Completed
Last Updated
3 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

This is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase 3 study designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Mesoblast's rexlemestrocel-L alone or combined with hyaluronic acid (HA) in participants with chronic low back pain (> 6 months) associated with moderate radiographic degenerative changes of a disc.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
March 6, 2015
End Date
June 15, 2021
Last Updated
3 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Sponsor

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Male and female participants 18 years of age and older
  • If female of childbearing potential, participant is non-pregnant, non-nursing, and agrees to use highly effective methods of contraception for a minimum of 24 months post-treatment
  • Signed informed consent and country-appropriate privacy forms indicating participant is willing to undergo treatment and willing to be available for each examination scheduled over the study duration
  • Have documented diagnosis of moderate radiographic degeneration of an intervertebral disc from L1 to S1, with a disc suspected of causing chronic low back pain (CLBP) associated with moderate radiographic degeneration at a lumbar disc is defined as the following (participant must meet all of the listed conditions):
  • Chronic low back pain for at least 6 months
  • Have failed 6 months of conservative back pain care. (Conservative treatment regimens may include any or all of the following: initial rest, medications \[e.g., anti-inflammatory, analgesics, narcotics/opioids, muscle relaxants\], massage, acupuncture, chiropractic manipulations, activity modification, home-directed lumbar exercise program, and non-invasive pain control treatments or procedures)
  • Have at a minimum undergone supervised physical therapy, such as daily walking routines, therapeutic exercises, and back education programs specifically for the treatment of low back pain and taken a pain medication for back pain (e.g. non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) and/or opioid medication).
  • Change from normal disc morphology of the index disc as defined by radiographic evaluation by the core imaging evaluation provider. Radiographs must show all of the following:
  • A modified Pfirrmann score of 3, 4, 5 or 6 on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at the index disc
  • Modic Grade II changes or less on MRI at the index disc

Exclusion Criteria

  • Female participants who are pregnant or nursing, or women planning to become pregnant in the first 24 months post-treatment
  • Extreme obesity, as defined by National Institutes of Health (NIH) Clinical Guidelines Body Mass Index (BMI \> 40)
  • Have undergone a surgical procedure (e.g. discectomy, intradiscal electrothermal therapy, intradiscal radiofrequency, artificial disc replacement, interbody fusion) on the disc at the index or adjacent level
  • Osteoporosis, as defined by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scan. A DEXA T-score of ≤ -2.5 will exclude the participant.
  • Any lumbar intradiscal injection, including steroids, into the index or adjacent discs prior to treatment injection, with the exception of the following injections performed at least 2 weeks prior to study treatment:
  • Contrast medium (discography or other diagnostic injection)
  • Nerve-blocking anesthetics (e.g., lidocaine, bupivacaine)
  • Antibiotics
  • Have undergone a procedure affecting the structure/biomechanics of the index disc level (e.g., posterolateral fusion)
  • Active malignancy or tumor as source of symptoms or history of malignancy within the 5 years prior to enrolment on study

Arms & Interventions

Rexlemestrocel-L

Participants received rexlemestrocel-L 2.0 mL injection of approximately 6 million rexlemestrocel-L cells in freeze media mixed in a 1:1 by-volume ratio with saline on Day 0 (Visit 2).

Intervention: Rexlemestrocel-L

Rexlemestrocel-L + HA

Participants received rexlemestrocel-L 2.0 mL injection of approximately 6 million rexlemestrocel-L cells in freeze media mixed in a 1:1 by-volume ratio with hyaluronic acid (HA) solution on Day 0 (Visit 2).

Intervention: Rexlemestrocel-L + HA Mixture

Placebo

Participants received saline solution as matching-placebo on Day 0 (Visit 2).

Intervention: Placebo

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Overall Treatment Success: Bayesian Estimated Response Rate

Time Frame: Up to 24 months

Overall treatment success was determined based on number of responders who had composite response at both months 12 and 24 evaluated per specified criteria. A treatment responder with treatment success was defined as a participant who met the 3 criteria of a composite responder analysis as: 50% or greater reduction in the lower-back pain visual analogue scale (VAS) score; 15-point or greater reduction in the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score; and lack of post-treatment interventions at the treated level as of the study visit (Visits 6 \[12 months post-treatment\] and 8 \[24 months post-treatment\]). The average response rate (proportion of participants with response presented as Bayesian estimate\[BE\]) was based upon the average of multiple Bayesian simulations.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Effectiveness Based on Functional Responders: Bayesian Estimated Response Rate(Up to 24 months)
  • Effectiveness Based on Treatment Success at 24 Months: Bayesian Estimated Response Rate(Month 24)
  • Effectiveness Based on Minimal Pain Responders at 24 Months: Bayesian Estimated Response Rate(Month 24)
  • Effectiveness Based on Pain Responders: Bayesian Estimated Response Rate(Up to 24 months)
  • Effectiveness Based on Minimal Disability Responders at 24 Months: Bayesian Estimated Response Rate(Month 24)
  • Effectiveness Based on Time to First Intervention Over 24 Months(Up to Month 24)

Study Sites (48)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials