Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT02895555
NCT02895555CompletedNot Applicable

RCT Comparing i-FACTOR and Allograft in Spinal Fusion Surgery

Spine Centre of Southern Denmark2 sites in 1 country102 target enrollmentStarted: March 1, 2012Last updated:
Conditions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Sponsor
Enrollment
102
Locations
2
Primary Endpoint
Oswestry disability index

Study Overview

Brief Summary

The average life expectancy in Denmark is increasing resulting in an increasing part of the population having age-related disease, ex lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). LSS causes constriction of the nerves in the lumbar spine resulting in pain in the legs and lower back, especially when standing and walking, known as neurogenic claudicatio(Goh KJ FAU - Khalifa et al.). LSS occurs in a combination of degenerative changes in the lower back, including hypertrophy of the ligamentum flavum, arthrosis of the facet joints and bulging of the disc.

Current treatment of LSS is varied ranging from non-operative conservative treatment to operation.

Operative intervention shows very good results according to physical ability and pain(Christensen FB et al.;Hee HT and Wong;McGregor AH FAU - Hughes and Hughes;Xu et al.), but the most optimal treatment is still debated. Nevertheless, a decompression and, if needed, a spinal fusion is recommended.

The investigators want to se whether i-FACTOR improves clinical outcomes compared to using allograft in spinal fusion in the elderly, and thereby find an improved methods operating this difficult patient population.

The hypothesis is, that there is no difference in clinical outcomes whether you use i-FACTOR or allograft i non-instrumented spinal fusion surgery in patients with spinal stenosis due to degenerative listhesis.

Detailed Description

Se above

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
60 Years to 100 Years (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • Spinal stenosis, listhesis grade 1-2 (>3 mm), facet joint arthrosis and flavum hypertrophia verified by a mr-scan and x-ray including maximally 2 levels ranging from L1-S
  • A score of 6 and more on Konno´s "History of Examination Characteristic".
  • Signed informed content.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Any disease demanding obligate thromboprophylaxis treatment, including mechanical valve, (DVT with cancer/thrombophilia, AMI, apoplexia cerebri, TCI, valve-operation)< 3 months, coronar metal stent < 6 weeks and coronar drug eluted/coated stent < 12 months.
  • Atrial fibrillation and one of the following: Mitral stenosis, valve prothesis and apoplexia cerebri/TCI.
  • Atrial fibrillation and two of the following: Heart insufficient, HT, DM, age > 75 years, EF < 35 %.
  • Known cancer in the axial skeleton.
  • Ongoing chemotherapy.
  • Fracture i the lower back within a year prior to inclusion.
  • Reduced distance of walking due to non-spinal related causes.
  • Candidate for more than two-level intervention.
  • Dementia assessed by the MMSE
  • Age below 60 years.
  • Missed 3 months of conservative treatment without success
  • The use of steroids and bisphosphonates.
  • Prior radiotherapy to the lower back.
  • Haematologic disease. -

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Oswestry disability index

Time Frame: At 60 months

questionnaire

Secondary Outcomes

  • Walking distance(At 24 months)
  • Fusion status yes/no(At 60 months)
  • Dallas pain questionnaire(At 24 months)
  • EQ5D(At 60 months)
  • SF-36(At 60 months)

Investigators

Sponsor
Spine Centre of Southern Denmark
Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Karen Højmark Hansen

Research coordinator

Spine Centre of Southern Denmark

Study Sites (2)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials