An Investigation of the Effects of Different Practical Roles in Simulation-Based Intermediate Life Support Training on Theoretical Knowledge, Practical Skill Acquisition, and Self-Assessment Among Undergraduate Dental Students
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 106
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Change in theoretical knowledge and practical skill scores across two time points during Intermediate Life Support (ILS) training
研究概览
简要总结
This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of theoretical and practical training on intermediate life support (ILS) among fifth-year dental students. Participants will be assigned to two roles during simulation-based sessions: practitioners, who perform the interventions, and evaluators, who assess peers using structured checklists. The study will compare theoretical knowledge and practical skills before and after the training, and assess the impact of peer evaluation on learning outcomes. A minimum of 84 students will be enrolled to ensure adequate statistical power. The results will inform the optimization of dental education in emergency life support training.
详细描述
This study aims to investigate the development of theoretical knowledge and practical skills of fifth-year dental students through pre- and post-training assessments, and to compare outcomes between study groups. Prior to receiving theoretical instruction, students will complete a baseline knowledge questionnaire to assess their initial theoretical understanding. Similarly, an initial practical assessment using an Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) will be conducted to determine baseline practical competence.
Following detailed theoretical training and practical exercises, students will be divided into two groups for simulation-based practical sessions:
Group 1 (Practitioners): Students in this group will participate as practitioners in additional practical sessions following joint theoretical and practical training.
Group 2 (Evaluators): Students in this group will serve as evaluators during the additional practical sessions, using structured checklists developed with the instructor.
During the ILS simulation exercises, practitioner students are expected to detect cardiac and respiratory arrest in adult and pediatric scenarios and implement acute management steps, including activating emergency services (calling 112), requesting an automated external defibrillator, and utilizing emergency intervention equipment. Practitioners will perform chest compressions and positive pressure ventilation with 100% oxygen using appropriate devices. To simulate single- or multi-rescuer interventions, practitioner students will perform in groups of one or two, while evaluators observe and provide immediate feedback. Each student will assume a leadership role at least once, with assisting students following the leader's instructions.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Single Group
- 主要目的
- Other
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 是
入选标准
- •Fifth-year students currently enrolled in the Faculty of Dentistry.
排除标准
- •Students who declined to participate in the study were excluded.
- •Students who demonstrated more than 10% absenteeism from the training sessions, where the missed sessions could not be made up
研究组 & 干预措施
Group 1
Practitioner
干预措施: Intermediate Life Support (ILS) Educational Program: Practitioner (Other)
Group 2
Evaluator
干预措施: Intermediate Life Support (ILS) Educational Program-Evaluator (Other)
结局指标
主要结局
Change in theoretical knowledge and practical skill scores across two time points during Intermediate Life Support (ILS) training
时间窗: Baseline (pre-training) and Post-training (within 20 minutes during pre and post training OSCE sessions)
Theoretical knowledge and practical skill levels of fifth-year dental students will be evaluated using written tests and Objective Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCEs) administered at two time points: before the training (baseline) and after the completion of the training (post-training). Changes in scores across these time points will be analyzed to assess learning and clinical skill competence progression.
次要结局
- Change and accuracy of self-assessment scores compared with peer and instructor evaluations during Intermediate Life Support (ILS) training(After each of the three simulation sessions (Session 1, Session 2, Session 3) (within 10 minutes during each sessions))
- Quality of written documentation and feedback provided by students during the final OSCE(At the final OSCE (post-training assessment), (within 15 minutes during third OSCE station))
研究者
Gözde Nur Erkan
Assisstant Professor
Kırıkkale University
