comparative study between digitally fabricated complete denture and conventional complete denture

Not Applicable

• Conditions: Health Condition 1: K069- Disorder of gingiva and edentulousalveolar ridge, unspecifiedHealth Condition 2: 8- Other Procedures

• Registration Number: CTRI/2020/03/024165
• Lead Sponsor: B T Pradeep Raja

Brief Summary

Not available

Detailed Description

Not available

Study Timeline

• Results First Posted: 1900-01-01
• Last Update Posted: 24 November 2021

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: ot Yet Recruiting
• Sex: Not specified
• Target Recruitment: 0

Inclusion Criteria

1.Completely edentulous patients with class I ridge relation, Class I &II ridge morphology (PDI).

2.Adult patients needing new complete dentures

3.Mentally receptiveness

4.Patients able to understand the informed consent

5.Patient who are able to come for 9-10 visits.

6.Absence of dysfunctional disorders of the masticatory system

7.Absence of debilitating systemic diseases

Exclusion Criteria

1.Refusal to participate in the study.

2.Patients with class II and class III ridge relation.

3.Patients with past history of Complete dentures

4.Symptoms of Temporomandibular disorders

5.Patients with severe xerostomia

6.Patients with parafunctional habits

7.Patients with severe oral manifestations of systemic disease

8.Psychologic or psychiatric conditions that could influence response to treatment.

9.Patient asking for implant supported/retained prostheses

Study & Design

• Study Type: Interventional
• Study Design: Not specified

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
1.Functional outcomes - Blinded evaluation of retention and stability using functional assessment of denture - FAD questionnaire <br/ ><br>2.Aesthetic outcomes - blinded evaluation of aesthetics using Frush and Fisher Aesthetics criteria <br/ ><br>3.Patient satisfaction <br/ ><br>4.Comfort- self evaluation of patients satisfaction and comfort by means of a denture satisfaction questionnaire <br/ ><br>Timepoint: After one month of each intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
PATIENT QUALITY OF LIFE assessment of patients quality of life (OHRQoL) before and after treatment by means of Oral Health Impact Profile Questionnaire (OHIP19)Timepoint: AFTER ONE MONTH OF EACH INTERVENTIO