Integrated Prevention of HIV Risk and Intimate Partner Violence Among Adolescents in South Africa

Not Applicable

Completed

Conditions: Intimate Partner Violence
Sexual Behavior

Registration Number: NCT03179982

Lead Sponsor: Brown University

Brief Summary: The purpose of this study is to test the feasibility and acceptability of Safe South Africa, an integrated intervention for preventing HIV and Intimate Partner Violence perpetration for male adolescents 15-17 years of age.

Detailed Description: This study will investigate the acceptability and feasibility of Safe South Africa, an integrated intervention to prevent adolescent behavioral risk for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and perpetration of intimate partner violence (IPV). Safe South Africa is a theory-driven, developmentally-tailored and gender-specific intervention designed for male adolescents 15-17 years of age. The research will be conducted in South Africa, a country with the largest HIV epidemic and some of the highest rates of IPV perpetration in the world. Preventive interventions are urgently needed during adolescence when risk for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and intimate partner violence (IPV) increases exponentially. Yet, few behavioral interventions integrate HIV-IPV prevention and are tailored for the unique age and developmental needs of adolescents. We will investigate the acceptability and feasibility of Safe South Africa with three study aims: (1) a development aim - this aim will result in the creation of Safe South Africa, an integrated male adolescent preventive intervention for HIV risk behavior and IPV perpetration; (2) an acceptability aim - this aim will consist of an evaluation of the social ecology of HIV and IPV risk with a survey of N=100 of adolescents, and a test of the acceptability of Safe South Africa through an open pilot trial with N=20 male adolescents; and (3) a feasibility aim - this aim will consist of a randomized controlled pilot trial with 1- and 6-month follow-up in a sample of N=60 male adolescents to assess the feasibility and acceptability for a future fully powered randomized controlled trial to evaluate efficacy of the intervention.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status: COMPLETED

Sex: Male

Target Recruitment: 60

Inclusion Criteria

Male adolescent
15-17 years of age, inclusive of 15 and 17

Exclusion Criteria

parent/guardian does not provide consent
adolescent does not provide assent

Study & Design

Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL

Study Design: PARALLEL

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Number of Participants With Satisfaction With Intervention Content	6 months	Satisfaction with intervention content is based off of a measure called the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire developed by Larsen DL, Attkisson CC, Hargreaves WA, Nguyen TD. Assessment of client/patient satisfaction: Development of a general scale. Evaluation and Program Planning. 1979;2:197-207. We focus on the question from that scale that assesses satisfaction with the program. The item asks, "How satisfied are you with the program you have received?" Participants could rank their satisfaction from: 1 = quite dissatisfied, 2 = mildly dissatisfied, 3 = mostly satisfied, 4 = very satisfied." Higher scores correspond with higher satisfaction with the intervention program.
Intervention Feasibility	6 months	Feasibility is measured by ability to recruit the planned number of participants into the trial. We wanted to recruit at least 95% of the target number of planned participants. Feasibility is also measured by retention of trial participants at the final timepoint. A cut off of 75% retention of all participants enrolled in the trial at the final timepoint is viewed as a good result for feasibility.
Intervention Fidelity	From the start of the intervention delivery period to the end of the delivery period - a 2 month timespan in total.	Fidelity was not based off a published measure. Rather, a neutral observer rated the facilitator's delivery skills and adherence to a manualized protocol for delivering the intervention that guided the consistent delivery of core theoretical components of the intervention. This neutral observer used the following rankings on a scale with rankings ranging from 1 (equating to a category labeled as low demonstration of skills, \<25% of the time) to 3 (equating to a category labeled as high demonstration of skills, \>75% of the time). An average ranking of 2.5 or more is seen as success for fidelity.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Number of Participants Who Refused Sex at 6 Months	6 months	Measured by comparing whether % of those who refused sex at 6 months versus baseline.
Number of Participants Engaging in Intimate Partner Violence at 6 Months	6 months	Measured by examining whether the prevalence of those engaging in intimate partner violence (forced vaginal sex) was significantly lower at 6 months as compared to baseline.
Change From Baseline in Likelihood of Bystander Intervention Behavior	6 months	The likelihood of engaging as an active bystander to stop violence is measured through the Bystander Behavior Scale, ranging from 1-40. The questions are answered on a 5-point Likert scale, ranging from 5 = "Very unlikely" to 1 = "Very likely". Lower scores correspond to more likelihood of intervening as an active bystander to stop violence, a measure developed by Miller E, Tancredi DJ, McCauley HL, Decker MR, Virata MCD, Anderson HA, et al. "Coaching Boys into Men": A Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial of a Dating Violence Prevention Program. Journal of Adolescent Health. 2012;51(5):431-8.