跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT02437045
NCT02437045已完成4 期

Pilot RCT of Meropenem Versus Piperacillin-Tazobactam for Definitive Treatment of Bloodstream Infections Caused by AmpC Beta-lactamase Producing Enterobacter Spp., Citrobacter Freundii, Morganella Morganii, Providencia Spp. or Serratia Marcescens. in Low-risk Patients

The University of Queensland6 个研究点 分布在 2 个国家目标入组 100 人开始时间: 2015年4月最近更新:
适应症
干预措施
相关药物

试验速览

阶段
4 期
状态
已完成
入组人数
100
试验地点
6
主要终点
Clinical and microbiological outcomes post bloodstream infection of patients treated with piperacillin/tazobactam and meropenem.

研究概览

简要总结

Infections of the blood are extremely serious and require intravenous antibiotic treatment. When the infection results from antibiotic resistant bacteria, the choice of antibiotic is an extremely important decision. Some types of bacteria produce enzymes that may inactivate essential antibiotics, related to penicillin, called 'beta-lactams'. Furthermore high level production of these enzymes can occur during therapy and lead to clinical failure, even when an antibiotic appears effective by laboratory testing. However, this risk of this occurring in clinical practice has only been well described in a limited range of antibiotic classes in a type of bacteria called Enterobacter. There is currently uncertainty as to whether a commonly used, and highly effective antibiotic, called piperacillin-tazobactam is subject to the same risk of resistance developing while on treatment. Infections caused by Enterobacter (and other bacteria with similar resistance mechanisms) are often treated with an alternative drug called meropenem (a carbapenem antibiotic), which is effective but has an extremely broad-spectrum of activity. Excessive use of carbapenems is driving further resistance to this antibiotic class - which represent our 'lastline' of antibiotic defence. As such, we need studies to help us see whether alternatives to meropenem are an effective and safe choice. No study has ever directly tested whether these two antibiotics have the same effectiveness for this type of infection. The purpose of this study is to randomly assign patients with blood infection caused by Enterobacter or related bacteria to either meropenem or piperacillin/tazobactam in order to test whether these antibiotics have similar effectiveness.

详细描述

Antibiotic resistance is a problem of immense public health significance. Effective antibiotics are essential to complex therapeutic interventions such as transplant medicine, critical care or major surgery. It is estimated that at least 2 million people acquire infections with bacteria that are resistant to standard therapy each year in the United States, with at least 23,000 deaths directly attributable to the infection. With few new antibacterial agents in late-stage development, it has been necessary to consider using existing generic agents in a more targeted approach. This might include revisiting therapeutic options that have previously been considered inferior.

Bloodstream infections caused by Gram negative bacteria are commonly encountered in clinical practice and can be associated with high rates of mortality. Outcomes may be dependent upon the timely administration of appropriate antibiotics, especially in septic shock. Bacteria that possess resistance mechanisms to commonly employed antibiotics are therefore of great concern and may contribute to further mortality.

Over the last 25 years, two antibiotic choices have predominated for intravenous management of these infections. These are combinations of beta-lactam antibiotics with beta-lactamase inhibitors (such as piperacillin/tazobactam) and third generation cephalosporins, such as ceftriaxone. However, some commonly encountered Gram negative organisms possess chromosomally encoded beta-lactamase enzymes, known as AmpC beta-lactamases, that may hydrolyse 3rd generation cephalosporins. Expression of AmpC may be inducible following beta-lactam exposure in some Enterobacteriaceae by loss of inhibitory effects from regulatory elements that control gene transcription. Furthermore, such inducible gene-expression can become constitutively 'de-repressed' by mutational loss of regulatory ampD or ampR genes, leading to high-levels of AmpC production and a phenotype that demonstrates in vitro resistance to most beta-lactams and beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor (BLBLI) combination agents, except cefepime or carbapenems. Such variants are usually present at low levels (e.g. between 10-5 to 10-7 of the total bacterial population) but may be rapidly selected for during antibiotic therapy.

As a result, AmpC-producing bacteria present particular problems for antibiotic susceptibility reporting and treatment. In vitro susceptibility may not correlate with clinical efficacy as resistance to beta-lactam antibiotics can emerge by selection of variants expressing high levels of AmpC. This has been best described in the context of Enterobacter bacteraemia and therapy with 3rd generation cephalosporins (3GCs). In a landmark study by Chow et al. in 1991, 129 patients with Enterobacter bacteraemia were prospectively examined. Prior cephalosporin use predicted a greater likelihood of identifying a multi-drug resistant isolate on initial blood culture, which was associated with higher subsequent mortality. Furthermore, emergence of resistance to cephalosporins developed during treatment in 6 (19%) of 31 bacteraemic episodes treated with cephalosporins. It is worth noting that this phenomenon was not seen in the small number of patients treated with piperacillin in this study, and that many of the Enterobacter isolates would now be reported as non-susceptible to 3GCs according to current breakpoints. Several other Gram-negative bacteria contain such inducible beta-lactamase genes with the capacity for de-repression. They have been informally labelled the 'ESCPM' group, and are variably described as comprising Enterobacter spp. (especially E. cloacae and E. aerogenes), Serratia marcescens, Citrobacter freundii, Providencia spp. and Morganella morganii.

Clinical studies have shown a variable risk of such emergent resistance and clinical failure occurring with beta-lactam therapy, particularly 3GCs, but when it occurs it has been associated with higher mortality and healthcare-related costs. As a result, 3GCs are usually not recommended as therapy for AmpC-producers, even when susceptible in vitro.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Bloodstream infection with Enterobacter spp., Serratia marcescens, Providencia spp., Morganella morganii or Citrobacter freundii (i.e. likely AmpC-producer), and susceptibility to 3rd generation cephalosporins (i.e. ceftriaxone, cefotaxime or ceftazidime), meropenem and piperacillin-tazobactam from at least one blood culture draw. This will be determined in accordance with laboratory methods and susceptibility breakpoints defined by protocols used in the recruiting site laboratories..
  • No more than 72 hours has elapsed since the first positive blood culture collection.
  • Patient is aged 18 years and over (>=21y in Singapore).

排除标准

  • Patient not expected to survive more than 4 days
  • Patient allergic to a penicillin or a carbapenem
  • Patient with significant polymicrobial bacteraemia (that is, a Gram positive skin contaminant in one set of blood cultures is not regarded as significant polymicrobial bacteraemia).
  • Treatment is not with the intent to cure the infection (that is, palliative care is an exclusion).
  • Pregnancy or breast-feeding.
  • Use of concomitant antimicrobials in the first 4 days after enrolment with known activity against Gram-negative bacilli (except trimethoprim/sulphamethoxazole may be continued as Pneumocystis prophylaxis).
  • Severe acute illness as defined by Pitt bacteraemia score of >4
  • Likely source to be from (proven or suspected at the time of randomisation) the central nervous system, e.g. brain abscess, post-surgical meningitis, shunt infection (due to concerns over CNS penetration of piperacillin/tazobactam)

研究组 & 干预措施

Meropenem

Active Comparator

Meropenem 1g every 8 hrs IV to day 4

干预措施: Meropenem (Drug)

Piperacillin-tazobactam combination product

Experimental

Piperacillin tazobactam 4.5g every 6 hrs IV to day 4

干预措施: Piperacillin-tazobactam combination product (Drug)

结局指标

主要结局

Clinical and microbiological outcomes post bloodstream infection of patients treated with piperacillin/tazobactam and meropenem.

时间窗: Composite end point; up to day 30.

Composite end-point of: Death: up to 30 days post randomisation. Clinical failure - defined as ongoing fever (Tmax \>=38.0oC) OR leucocytosis (white blood cell count \>12x109/L) - assessed on day 5 post randomisation. Microbiological failure - defined as positive blood culture or any sterile site specimen with same species as initial (index) blood culture on day 3-5. Microbiological relapse - defined as growth from any sterile site of the same organism as in the original blood culture after day 5 but before day 30; If any of the above criteria are fulfilled post randomisation, the composite end-point has occurred. A composite end-point has been used as overall mortality is expected to be low in this subset of patients screened for 'low-risk' infections, and so is unlikely to be a useful primary outcome measure in isolation.

次要结局

  • Clinical and microbiological success day 5.(Day five.)
  • Length of hospital and/or ICU stay post randomisation.(Participants will be followed for the duration of their hospitalisation and/or up to the thirty day study time period.)
  • Time to clinical resolution of infection.(Resolution of infection will be monitored from day of randomisation up to study day five or when the patient exhibits a temperature below 38 degrees celcius.)
  • Requirement for escalation of antibiotic therapy.(Days 1-5.)
  • Requirement for ICU admission: if not in ICU at the time of enrolment, during days 1 to 5 post-randomisation.(Days 1-5.)
  • Infection with a piperacillin-tazobactam / carbapenem resistant organism or Clostridium difficile.(Days 5-30.)
  • Microbiological failure with AmpC-mediated resistance.(After day 5 before day 30.)
  • Colonisation with any multi-drug resistant organism.(Days 1-30.)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Professor David L. Paterson

Professor David L. Paterson

The University of Queensland

研究点 (6)

Loading locations...

相似试验