ACTRN12605000439640
Active, not recruiting
Not Applicable
aparoscopic versus open colposuspension for women with stress urinary incontinence: A prospective multicentre randomised single blind comparison of urodynamic cure of stress urinary incontinence at 6 months following surgery.
rogynaecology unit Royal womens Hospital0 sites200 target enrollmentSeptember 20, 2005
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Stress urinary incontinence
- Sponsor
- rogynaecology unit Royal womens Hospital
- Enrollment
- 200
- Status
- Active, not recruiting
- Last Updated
- 6 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
No summary available.
Investigators
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- Not provided
Exclusion Criteria
- Not provided
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Not specified
Similar Trials
Recruiting
Not Applicable
aparoscopic versus vaginal approach closure complicationsclosure of vaginal vault complicationsPACTR202309800116065Sayed Galal65
Completed
Phase 4
aparoscopic versus open abdominal sacral colpopexy for vaginal vault prolapse. A comparison of effectivity, quality of life and costs.vault prolapse10047789NL-OMON30804Máxima Medisch Centrum74
Completed
Not Applicable
aparoscopic versus open abdominal sacral colpopexy for vaginal vault prolapse.Vaginal Vault ProlapseSacral colpopexyLaparoscopis sacral colpopexyAbdominal sacral colpopexyTopprolapsSacrocolpopexieLaparoscopische sacropexieLaparotomische sacropexieNL-OMON28743Máxima Medical Centre74
Recruiting
Not Applicable
vaginal and abdominal surgery for female stress incontinencestress incontienceReproductive Health and Childbirth - Other reproductive health and childbirth disordersSurgery - Surgical techniquesACTRN12616001097437Ahmed samy el-agwany20
Recruiting
Not Applicable
aparoscopic sacrocolpopexy versus vaginal sacrospinous fixation for vaginal vault prolapsevrouwelijke geslachtsorganen: bekkenbodemPelvic organ prolapseNL-OMON47730Maxima Medisch Centrum106