Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT01403584
NCT01403584CompletedNot Applicable

Adjustment of Non-invasive Positive Pressure Ventilation in Patients With Chronic Hypercapnic Ventilatory Failure Using Automated End-expiratory Pressure (AutoEEP) Algorithm

ResMed1 site in 1 country21 target enrollmentStarted: July 1, 2011Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Sponsor
Enrollment
21
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Index of Apneoas Plus Hypopnoeas Per Hour of Sleep (AHI)

Study Overview

Brief Summary

The aim of the study is to test the hypothesis that an automated algorithm for desired mask pressure improves breathing pattern and sleep quality in patients with hypercapnic ventilatory failure. For this purpose, The investigators will study different groups of patients, including those with obstructive and restrictive ventilatory defect, and obstructive sleep apnoea, non-naive to conventional bi-level positive airways pressure therapy.

Detailed Description

Persisting ventilatory failure associated with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), obesity-hypoventilation-syndrome, sleep apnoea or neuromuscular disease is increasingly managed with domiciliary non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV).

Optimal settings of non-invasive ventilation are usually titrated manually and require time and expertise. The development of systems lead to automated analysis and development of algorithms to adjust ventilators. However, there is a paucity of optimal algorithms, particularly the problem of upper airway obstruction. Therefore, the central aim of this study is to develop the automated setting of an end-expiratory positive airway pressure (EPAP), because upper airway obstruction is relatively common in this group of patients. We hypothesise that an automated end-expiratory airway pressure (AutoEEP) adjusting algorithm could overcome these problems and further optimise and adjust ventilator settings. Using non-invasive ventilation in patients with hypercapnic ventilatory failure, awake and asleep, we will measure physiological outcome parameters and apply an AutoEEP algorithm, comparing it against usual care.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Crossover
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
Single (Participant)

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to 75 Years (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • •Subjects will be patients not naive to noninvasive ventilation, and being so treated for any form of hypercapnic ventilatory failure.
  • •Previously stabilised on bilevel noninvasive pressure support ventilation.
  • •Both genders, age <75years.
  • •Previously shown to have a requirement for an EEP above cm H2O in order to maintain upper airway patency, or those in whom such a raised EEP would be expected, e.g. obese patients.
  • •Patients also known to have adequate airway patency at an EEP of 4 to 5 cm H2O will be included to ensure specificity of the algorithm.

Exclusion Criteria

  • •Acute critical illness (e.g. acute coronary syndrome, stroke)
  • •Serious anatomical variations of nose, sinuses, pharynx or oesophagus.
  • •Any condition at risk of oesophageal bleeding (e.g. oesophageal varices, gastric ulcer, etc.)
  • •Age >75 years
  • •Pregnancy
  • •Psychiatric disorders that could possibly influence the study
  • •Any kind of addiction
  • •Insufficient knowledge of the language
  • •Noninvasive ventilation otherwise contraindicated

Arms & Interventions

AutoVPAP without addition of AutoEPAP

Active Comparator

This arm will receive conventionally applied Expiratory Positive Airway Pressure. Patients randomised to this group will then receive the other treatment the following night.

Intervention: AutoVPAP with addition of AutoEPAP (Device)

AutoVPAP with addition of AutoEPAP

Experimental

This arm will receive conventional device modified to enable algorithm for automatically applied Expiratory Positive Airway Pressure. Patients randomised to this group will then receive the other treatment the following night.

Intervention: AutoVPAP with addition of AutoEPAP (Device)

AutoVPAP with addition of AutoEPAP

Experimental

This arm will receive conventional device modified to enable algorithm for automatically applied Expiratory Positive Airway Pressure. Patients randomised to this group will then receive the other treatment the following night.

Intervention: AutoVPAP with EPAP manually selected (Device)

AutoVPAP without addition of AutoEPAP

Active Comparator

This arm will receive conventionally applied Expiratory Positive Airway Pressure. Patients randomised to this group will then receive the other treatment the following night.

Intervention: AutoVPAP with EPAP manually selected (Device)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Index of Apneoas Plus Hypopnoeas Per Hour of Sleep (AHI)

Time Frame: On completion of each consecutive night of polysomnography.

The AHI is a count of the number of pauses during sleep a person experiences. The total number of apneas/ hypopneas (sleep pauses) are divided by the total sleep time to get an index for that night

Secondary Outcomes

  • Mean SpO2(On completion of each night of 2 consecutive nights polysomnography.)

Investigators

Sponsor
ResMed
Sponsor Class
Industry
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials