MedPath

A Safety and Efficacy Study to Evaluate Romosozumab (AMG 785) in South Korean Women With Osteoporosis

Phase 3
Completed
Conditions
Postmenopausal Osteoporosis
Interventions
Drug: Placebo
Registration Number
NCT02791516
Lead Sponsor
Amgen
Brief Summary

The primary objective is to evaluate the effect of treatment with romosozumab for 6 months compared with placebo on percent changes in bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine as assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
Female
Target Recruitment
67
Inclusion Criteria
  • Ambulatory postmenopausal Korean women, ≥ 55 to ≤ 90 years of age at enrollment.
  • Postmenopause is defined as no spontaneous vaginal bleeding or spotting for 12 or more consecutive months prior to screening.
  • BMD T-score </= -2.50 at the lumbar spine, total hip or femoral neck.
  • At least 2 vertebrae in the L1 through L4 region and at least one hip are evaluable by DXA.
  • Other inclusion criteria may apply.
Exclusion Criteria
  • Subjects with a BMD T-score </= -4.0 at the lumbar spine, total hip, or femoral neck.
  • History of hip fracture.
  • Bone disease other than osteoporosis/ or evidence of any other clinically significant disorder, condition/ or disease or significant laboratory abnormalities.
  • Known sensitivity or intolerance calcium and vitamin D products.
  • Other exclusion criteria may apply.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
PlaceboPlaceboParticipants received placebo subcutaneous injection once a month for 6 months.
RomosozumabRomosozumabParticipants received 210 mg romosozumab by subcutaneous injection once a month for 6 months.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Percent Change From Baseline to Month 6 in Bone Mineral Density at the Lumbar SpineBaseline and month 6

Bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine was assessed by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Images were assessed by a central reader.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Percent Change From Baseline to Month 6 in Bone Mineral Density at the Total HipBaseline and month 6

Bone mineral density (BMD) at the total hip was assessed by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Images were assessed by a central reader.

Percent Change From Baseline to Month 6 in Bone Mineral Density at the Femoral NeckBaseline and month 6

Bone mineral density (BMD) at the femoral neck was assessed by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Images were assessed by a central reader.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Research Site

🇰🇷

Suwon-si, Gyeonggi-do, Korea, Republic of

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath