Assessment of Maxillary Canine Retraction Using Self-ligating Brackets System Assisted With Micro-osteoperforations

Not Applicable

• Conditions: Accerleration of Tooth Movement
• Interventions: Biological: conventional bracket with micro osteoperforation; Biological: self ligating bracket with micro osteoperforation; Biological: conventional bracket without micro osteoperforation; Biological: self ligating bracket without micro osteoperforation

• Registration Number: NCT05595174
• Lead Sponsor: Al-Azhar University

Brief Summary

Assessment of maxillary canine retraction using self-ligating brackets system assisted with micro-osteoperforations: A prospective controlled clinical study

Detailed Description

Not available

Study Timeline

• Study First Submitted: 2022-10-23
• Study First Submitted QC: 2022-10-23
• Study First Posted: 2022-10-26
• Status Verified: 2024-01
• Last Update Submitted: 2024-01-01
• Last Update Posted: 2024-01-03
• Study Start: 2024-01-15
• Primary Completion: 2024-06-15
• Study Completion: 2024-08-15

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 16

Inclusion Criteria

• Both male and female patients between the age (14-20 y).
• Patients indicated for maxillary first premolar extraction.
• Angle's Class I bimaxillary, Class II Division 1 malocclusion (ANB <5).
• Irregularity index < 4 mm.
• No previous orthodontic treatment.
• Fully erupted dentition.

Exclusion Criteria

• Patients not indicated for non-extraction approach.
• Prominent canine root (in labial cortical bone).
• History of systemic and medical illness that could interfere with OTM.
• Previous orthodontic treatment.
• Extreme skeletal class II occlusion (ANB >5).
• Poor oral hygiene or periodontally compromised patient

Study & Design

• Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Design: PARALLEL

Arm && Interventions

Group	Intervention	Description
group 2	conventional bracket without micro osteoperforation	Patient with conventional bracket with split mouth with and without micro-osteoperforations. Extraction of first premolars were done. A standardized wire sequence of .012'', 0.014'',0,016'', and 0.016''×0.022'' nickel-titanium were followed to achieve leveling and alignment.
group 1	self ligating bracket without micro osteoperforation	Patient with self-ligating bracket system split mouth with and without micro-osteoperforations. Extraction of first premolars were done. A standardized wire sequence of .012'', 0.014'',0,016'', and 0.016''×0.022'' nickel-titanium were followed to achieve leveling and alignment.
group 2	conventional bracket with micro osteoperforation	Patient with conventional bracket with split mouth with and without micro-osteoperforations. Extraction of first premolars were done. A standardized wire sequence of .012'', 0.014'',0,016'', and 0.016''×0.022'' nickel-titanium were followed to achieve leveling and alignment.
group 1	self ligating bracket with micro osteoperforation	Patient with self-ligating bracket system split mouth with and without micro-osteoperforations. Extraction of first premolars were done. A standardized wire sequence of .012'', 0.014'',0,016'', and 0.016''×0.022'' nickel-titanium were followed to achieve leveling and alignment.

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
effect of canine retraction	at 6 months	assessment of maxillary canine retraction rate using self-ligating brackets system assisted with micro-osteoperforations.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Alazhar University; 🇪🇬 Cairo, Egypt