MedPath

RealMove (Lung): Assessing Tumour Motion With Dynamic MRI

Not Applicable
Recruiting
Conditions
Lung Tumor
Interventions
Other: Dynamic MRI
Registration Number
NCT06322329
Lead Sponsor
Region Stockholm
Brief Summary

The study aims to develop an improved method to tailor the geometric safety margin when treating with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), to avoid tumour cells being missed during irradiation and to limit the exposure of normal tissues as much as possible. Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is assumed to represent the tumour motion during the respiratory cycle more realistically, compared to 4-dimensional computed tomography (4D CT), thanks to its high temporal resolution and the possibility to image the motion over a longer period of time. Patients receiving SBRT for a pulmonary target located below the level of the carina are included in the study, and the hypothesis will be tested through a comparison of the tumour amplitude measured with each modality. Furthermore, the predictive value of the image series acquired at treatment planning, for the motion patterns observed at each treatment fraction, will be evaluated through repeated 4D CBCT acquisitions.

Detailed Description

In the current study, a 2D-cine MRI examination will be performed, in addition to the 4D CT examination that is standard for patients receiving radiotherapy for tumours in the thorax or abdomen. A subgroup of the study participants (referred to as the 4D CBCT subcohort) will also be required to perform a 4D CBCT examination at three treatment sessions. The main cohort consists of 95 subjects and the 4D CBCT subcohort of 55 subjects. The study does not involve any change in the treatment routine; rather, the study images are collected for retrospective analysis. Following each imaging session, the subject should fill out an anxiety questionnaire and their pulse will be measured, to give an indication of any anxiety which might influence the breathing pattern of the current session.

Clinical follow-up will be performed retrospectively by reviewing the participants' medical records. Progress, health status and treatment-related toxicity will be evaluated, up to 10 years after completed treatment.

The study objectives are:

* To evaluate dynamic MRI for characterising the respiratory-related tumour motion, compared to the current standard modality of 4D CT.

* To evaluate the variation in breathing motion at different times points.

* To evaluate the clinical outcome.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
150
Inclusion Criteria
  • Accepted for SBRT treatment of one or more caudally situated lung targets (NSCLC or metastases), i.e. below the carina.
  • Age β‰₯ 18 years
  • Adequate clinical condition to maintain immobilised position for at least 30 minutes
  • Adequate Swedish skills and cognitive function to understand study information and to fill in the questionnaire
Exclusion Criteria
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding, or planned pregnancy or breastfeeding, during treatment
  • Contraindication for MRI examination
  • Otherwise incapable of participating in study

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
SINGLE_GROUP
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Full cohortDynamic MRIAll subjects are included in the same arm.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Difference in amplitude of the tumour motion, as assessed by dynamic MRI and 4D CT, respectivelyEvaluated twice pre-treatment, including during the intervention, and three times during treatment

The two dynamic scans represent the tumour motion through different techniques. If the amplitude indicated by 4D CT is smaller than that indicated by dynamic MRI, the hypothesis is confirmed.

Difference in amplitude of the tumour motion, assessed at different times (using dynamic MRI and 4D CBCT)Evaluated twice pre-treatment, including during the intervention, and three times during treatment

4D CBCT images are acquired at each treatment session, in treatment position. These will assess the stability of the breathing patter through the treatment course.

Difference in the structure of the probability density function, assessed at different timesEvaluated twice pre-treatment, including during the intervention, and three times during treatment

The breathing pattern is represented by a probability density function, indicating the regularity of the motion. The stability of this pattern through the treatment course will be assessed.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Anxiety during examinations of tumour motionEvaluated twice pre-treatment, including during the intervention, and three times during treatment

Measured by a questionnaire

Overall survivalUp to 10 years after treatment

Review of medical records

Progression-free survivalUp to 10 years after treatment

Review of medical records

Grade β‰₯2 toxicity assessed by CTCAE v.5.0Up to 10 years after treatment

Review of medical records

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Karolinska University Hospital

πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡ͺ

Stockholm, Sweden

Β© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath