跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT06691724
NCT06691724已完成不适用

Ambient Scribe in General Practice: a Multi-perspective Before-after Longitudinal Mixed-methods Study

Erasmus Medical Center1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 800 人开始时间: 2024年12月9日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
800
试验地点
1
主要终点
Time spent on documentation

研究概览

简要总结

General practitioners (GPs) in the Netherlands are under unsustainable pressure. Recent surveys show that 68% of general practitioners find the workload too high and 18% find their work extremely or very stressful. The pressure on GPs significantly harms patient care, as reduced physician well-being can negatively impact patient experiences, treatment adherence, patient-provider communication, healthcare costs, care quality, and patient safety.

A key contributor to the stress is the increasing time commitment associated with clinical documentation. The documentation process has evolved into a time-intensive task, which is a significant obstacle to efficient patient care. Large language models (LLMs) are promising artificial intelligence (AI) solutions to reduce the documentation in general practice. In this project, the investigators aim to study an AI-based transcription and reporting tool in general practice.

详细描述

Introduction Over the years the introduction of the electronic health record (EHR) and escalating demands for documentation have led to a mounting burden on GPs. Clinical documentation is a major barrier to efficient patient care as last year more than half the GPs spend more than 20% of their time on administrative duties. This burden leads to reduced job satisfaction and well-being, increased rates of burnout, and employee attrition. The documentation burden also negatively influences patient-provider communication. It leads to GPs making less eye contact, having a more closed body posture, and conveying less information to their patients. The documentation in the EHR however also has positive effects, such as reduced cognitive load and improvements in patient safety and care. Reducing the provider-computer interaction during the consultation may improve patient-provider interaction and provider well-being while retaining the benefits of EHRs.

In fact, studies showed that employing medical assistants for documentation during consultations leads to an increase in face-to-face time and improves patient satisfaction. Moreover, speech-to-text technologies for dictation after the consultation alleviated the documentation burden by increasing documentation speed, patient experience, and provider satisfaction. These interventions may lower burnout and attrition rates, strengthening the well-being of the providers as well as that of the healthcare sector.

The rapid advancement of large language models (LLMs) has opened new avenues to reduce documentation burden. LLMs, such as ChatGPT, are artificial intelligence (AI) models that can interpret and generate text. These models can transcribe and summarize a consultation with the GP in real-time removing the need for medical assistants or dictation after the consultation. However, if the LLM makes mistakes, this may lead to increased administrative workload. The investigators aim to assess the effect of a AI-based transcription and reporting tool in general practice.

Objectives Our primary objective is to assess the effect of a transcription and reporting tool on time spent on clinical documentation in general practice.

Secondary objectives are to assess the effect of a transcription and reporting tool in general practice on

研究设计

研究类型
Observational
观察模型
Other
时间视角
Prospective

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • 未提供

排除标准

  • 未提供

结局指标

主要结局

Time spent on documentation

时间窗: Measured during the consultation (baseline and intervention)

This outcome refers to the time spent on documentation for a clinical consultation. The investigators will measure time outcomes through continuous observation. An external observer will monitor the time spent on various tasks during a consultation, including taking the medical history, conducting the physical examination, explaining the diagnosis or treatment plan, consulting a colleague, clinical documentation, and administrative duties like prescribing or referring.

次要结局

  • Total consultation time(Measured during the consultation (baseline and intervention))
  • GP experience with the tool(Measured within one week after the two-day intervention period)
  • Patient experience with the consultation(Measured within 1 week after the consultation)
  • Patient experience with the tool(Measured within 1 week after the consultation)
  • Usage rates(Measured directly after the consultation)
  • Documentation volume(Measured directly after the consultation)
  • Documentation information density(Measured directly after the consultation)
  • GP acceptability and use of the tool(Measured 1 week before the baseline period, 1 week before the start of the intervention period, and 1 week after intervention period)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Margreet Vlastuin

RCA van Linschoten, MD, Principal investigator

Erasmus Medical Center

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验