跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT01347177
NCT01347177撤回不适用

A Single-centre Randomised Controlled Clinical Trial of Zirconia-based Versus Metal-based Adhesive Bridges for Replacing 2 Missing Teeth or Less in Adults.

Queen Mary University of London2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家开始时间: 2012年4月最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
撤回
试验地点
2
主要终点
Clinical survival of adhesive bridges

研究概览

简要总结

Adhesive bridges are becoming popular in patients with congenitally missing teeth and these are type of bridges that can be done with only minimal or with no preparation to replace the missing tooth/teeth. The best clinical gain is the minimal tooth preparation or no need for the removal of tooth substance. Treatment for this type of bridges does not usually require anaesthesia. In addition, adhesive bridges can provide reasonable aesthetical outcome with minimal cost and reduced chair time.

The biggest issue is that high failure rate in the long term, and gray colour shining through the metal wing cemented onto the abutment tooth. This can compromise the aesthetical outcome. The aesthetical problem can be solved by the use of zirconia all ceramic material to construct the bridge.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Other
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 80 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Male or female ≥ 18 years of age
  • Has a maximum of 2 units requiring placement
  • Is a regular dental attendee and agree to return for assessments
  • Written subject informed consent (IC) for this protocol will be obtained prior to study enrolment. Each subject will be required to sign and date the IC form prior to their participation
  • Sound or minimally restored abutment(s)

排除标准

  • The presence of any periodontal pocket depths equal or above 4 mm with active periodontal disease
  • Any history of adverse reaction to clinical materials to be used in this study
  • They are pregnant or had serious medical condition that may interfere with the dental treatment
  • Acquired tooth loss more than 2 units requiring replacement
  • Participants who have parafunctional habits
  • Severe Class II Div II cases

结局指标

主要结局

Clinical survival of adhesive bridges

时间窗: 5 Years

Evaluation of clinical survival: participants will be evaluated according to the modified USPHS criteria. The evaluation criteria will include: retention, framework fracture, veneering fracture, marginal adaptation, recurrent caries and colour match. The examination will be after one to two weeks, after 3, 6, 9, 12 and 18 months, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years. The evaluation will also include the biological complication. Plaque, gingival index, periodontal probing depth and gingival recession will be evaluated around the abutments and compared to a control tooth

次要结局

  • Marginal discrepancy evaluation.(After cementation)
  • Economic evaluation(5 years)
  • Quality of life, aesthetic outcome.(18 months)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验