Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of CAD/CAM vs Conventionally Constructed Occlusal Splints in Patients With Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
- Conditions
- Temporomandibular Disorder
- Interventions
- Device: CAD/CAM splints
- Registration Number
- NCT04591899
- Lead Sponsor
- Cairo University
- Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to compare between digitally formed occlusal splints versus conventional occlusal splints in patients with TMDs regarding patient satisfaction
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- UNKNOWN
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 20
- Patients' age ranging from 20 to 50 years.
TMDs according to the research diagnostic criteria (RDC) for TMD (RDC/TMD) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for confirmation which include:
i. Painful TMJ audible and palpable click. ii. No functional mouth limitation. iii. TMJ tenderness. Fully dentate patients without any malocclusion and good oral hygiene. Co-operative patient that should show motivation to follow up.
- Patients with systemic diseases which could affect TMJ, e.g., rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthrosis, Myasthenia Gravis and fibromyalgia.
- Patients showing bony irregularities e.g. osteophyte as recorded by Magnetic resonance imaging.
- Patients taking analgesic, muscle relaxant, or anti-inflammatory drugs were excluded because such drugs could influence the results.
- Any condition that contra-indicates MRI such as patients with pacemakers in heart.
- Patients with removable dental prosthesis
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description CAD/CAM SS CAD/CAM splints - Conventionally manufactured SS CAD/CAM splints -
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Patient Satisfaction, done by questionnaire having the visual analogue scale 3 months The questionnaire includes the following aspects; headaches, face pain, jaw joint pain, jaw joint noises, mastication pain, neck pain, face tension, limitation of mouth opening, complaints during mastication, and teeth sensitivity at baseline 1 and 2 weeks after, then after 1,2 and 3 months. The questioner will be translated into Arabic language to be understood by the patients.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method