跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT06618742
NCT06618742招募中不适用

Focal Cryoballoon Ablation for Dysphagia Palliation in Patients with Advanced Esophageal Cancer

Laura Boer1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 20 人开始时间: 2024年6月24日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
招募中
发起方
入组人数
20
试验地点
1
主要终点
Primary outcome safety

研究概览

简要总结

Rationale:

Dysphagia is commonly encountered in patients with esophageal carcinoma who are no candidates for treatment with curative intent. It often has a considerable impact on quality of life and can cause malnourishment. Current palliative treatments mainly include esophageal stenting and radiotherapy, but these can be associated with substantial drawbacks such as a high rate of adverse events, fatigue or an untimely/ temporary symptom improvement. Recent studies showed promising results for the use of spray cryotherapy as palliation for dysphagia. Moreover, there are suggestions that cryotherapy has a positive effect on the host's anti-tumor response. However, no data exists on the feasibility, efficacy and safety for cryoballoon therapy in the esophagus. Secondly, cryo-immunologic data in patients with EC is lacking.

Objective:

  1. To evaluate the feasibility of cryoballoon ablation in patients with esophageal carcinoma and symptoms of dysphagia. Additionally, efficacy and safety will be assessed.
  2. To evaluate the effect of cryoballoon ablation on host's anti-tumor response. Study design: Pilot study, Multi-center Prospective Uncontrolled Intervention

Study Study population: Adult patients (≥18 years) with dysphagia due to incurable esophageal carcinoma Intervention (if applicable): Focal cryoballoon ablation of visible tumor during an upper endoscopy. Cryoballoon ablation will be performed for two cycles of 12 seconds. In total, patients will undergo 3 treatment sessions (range 1-3) with an interval of 1-3 weeks based onthe severity of symptoms reported by the patient.

Main study parameters/endpoints:

  • - Feasibility of cryoballoon ablation defined as technical success of the procedure

  • Safety based on incidence of procedure-related serious adverse events

  • Efficacy defined as success rates two weeks after the last cryoablation treatment based on patient reported symptom improvement, and objective evaluation of the esophageal lumen that is free from tumor

  • Host's anti-tumor response after cryoballoon ablation based on sequential esophageal tumor biopsies and peripheral blood samples

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Na
干预模型
Single Group
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Age >18 years at time of consent
  • Histopathologically-confirmed esophageal / gastroesophageal cancer
  • Patients in the palliative setting (with or without (future) systemic chemotherapy)
  • Dysphagia defined as a score of ≥2 (able to swallow only semi-solids)
  • Signed written informed consent

排除标准

  • Alternative etiology for dysphagia
  • Inability to pass the ultraslim endoscope
  • Severe medical comorbidities precluding endoscopy
  • Uncorrected coagulopathy
  • Prior distal esophagectomy
  • Previous esophageal varices
  • Expected survival <6 weeks
  • Prior radiotherapy for esophageal cancer
  • T4b esophageal cancer
  • Incapacitated subjects
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding

结局指标

主要结局

Primary outcome safety

时间窗: 2 weeks

Safety based on incidence of all procedure related serious adverse events up to the end of follow-up. The technique is considered to be safe if ≥80% of the procedures is performed without the occurrence of procedure-related serious adverse events.

primary outcome efficacy

时间窗: 2 weeks

Efficacy * Subjective parameters based on clinical success rate at week 2 after last therapy, using the 5 point Likert dysphagia score (0= no dysphagia, 1= dysphagia to solids, 2= dysphagia to semisolids, 3= dysphagia to liquids, 4= dysphagia to saliva). An improvement of one point is considered as clinical success. * Objective parameters: * Ability of the diagnostic endoscope to pass * Percentage of the diameter of the esophageal lumen that is open/ free from tumor, as assessed by the treating endoscopist and two independent assessors, comparing pre- and post-treatment.

primary outcome feasibility

时间窗: 1 day

Feasibility: defined as technical success rates of a full cryotherapy procedure. This includes the ability to pass the scope and the completion of a full circle of freezing and thawing, with the number of cycles needed per site as deemed necessary by the endoscopist. The technique is considered to be feasible if ≥70% of the procedures is technically successful.

次要结局

  • secondary outcome efficacy subjective(12 weeks)
  • secondary outcome pain(2 weeks)
  • secondary outcome safety(12 weeks)
  • secondary outcome other palliation(12 weeks)
  • Secondary outcome immunology(12 weeks)

研究者

发起方
Laura Boer
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor Investigator
主要研究者

Laura Boer

Principle Investigator

UMC Utrecht

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验