Safety and Efficacy of Implantable Collamer Lens Versus Implantable Phakic Lens IPCL in Myopic Patients; A Comparative Study
Not Applicable
Completed
- Conditions
- Myopia
- Interventions
- Procedure: Implantable Intraocular Lens (IPCL)Procedure: Implantable Collamer Lens (ICL)
- Registration Number
- NCT06058780
- Lead Sponsor
- Al-Azhar University
- Brief Summary
Phakic intraocular lenses (pIOL) have proven to be a great alternative to corneal refractive surgery in certain situations. They offer several advantages over corneal techniques, such as being suitable for high myopes and causing relatively fewer higher-order aberrations. In addition, pIOLs have been shown to provide better retinal image magnification and higher contrast sensitivity compared to laser in situ keratomileusis, regardless of whether the myopia is low or high.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 200
Inclusion Criteria
- myopia of more than 6 diopter
Exclusion Criteria
- unstable refraction
- unstable refraction
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Implantable Intraocular Lens (IPCL) Implantable Intraocular Lens (IPCL) - Implantable Collamer Lens (ICL) Implantable Collamer Lens (ICL) -
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Refraction 12 months postoperative postoperative refractive error measured in spherical equivalent
UCVA 12 months postoperative Uncorrected Visual Acuity measured in decimal
BCVA 12 months postoperative Best corrected Visual Acuity measured in decimal
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Akram Fekry Elgazzar
🇪🇬Damietta, Egypt