The Reducing Exercise Sensitivity With Exposure Training (RESET) Study: Interoceptive Bias Reduction Training After Acute Coronary Syndrome
Overview
- Phase
- N/A
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Acute Coronary Syndrome
- Sponsor
- Columbia University
- Enrollment
- 4
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- Percentage of Participants That Are Adherent to the Intervention (Intervention Adherence)
- Status
- Terminated
- Last Updated
- 2 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
This study investigates the feasibility of conducting a home-based reducing exercise sensitivity with exposure training (RESET) intervention among acute coronary syndrome (ACS) survivors. RESET is an at-home, 2 visit intervention that involves psychoeducation, a brief, low-to-moderate intensity walking session (i.e., interoceptive exposure), and interoceptive counseling, and is designed to reduce exercise sensitivity (i.e., fear of exercise sensations) and improve participation in exercise-based secondary-prevention guidelines (cardiac rehabilitation and physical activity). The primary purpose of this pilot study is to test the feasibility, acceptability, and appropriateness of recruiting and administering the RESET intervention in ACS patients.
Detailed Description
Fear of exercise may be prominent among acute coronary syndrome (ACS) survivors due to the presence of physical disease states that can exacerbate uncertainty about bodily sensations. For instance, patients may perceive physical sensations experienced during exercise (e.g., increased heart rate, shortness of breath, fatigue) as dangerous, intolerable, or similar to sensations experienced or attributed to their ACS, resulting in a fear of exercise sensations (i.e., exercise sensitivity). As a result, patients may avoid heart healthy activities, such as cardiac rehabilitation (CR) and physical activity, that prompt these physical sensations or terminate activities at the first sign of discomfort. Novel programs that target patient-level fears related to exercise sensations (i.e., exercise sensitivity) during the first-year post-discharge (the time window patients are eligible for CR) may be needed to improve CR participation and physical activity levels. To the investigator's knowledge, no intervention has been developed specifically to reduce exercise sensitivity in ACS survivors within the first year post-hospital discharge; a vulnerable population that is extremely sedentary, fails to meet physical activity guidelines, and with the most to gain from CR and physical activity participation. Thus, the investigator developed a de novo protocol for a reducing exercise sensitivity with exposure training (RESET) intervention.
Investigators
Andrea Duran
Assistant Professor in the Department of Medicine
Columbia University
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Age 18 years or older.
- •Speak and read English.
- •A diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) based on ICD10 codes in the electronic health record within the past 12 months.
- •Scored \>1 (sometimes, often, or very often) on at least one item from the Aversive Cognitions about Physical Activity Scale and/or scored \>1 (some, much, or very much) on at least one item from the Exercise Sensations Questionnaire
- •Owns either a tablet or smartphone (iPhone or Android) to conduct Zoom video visits.
- •Express interest in participating.
Exclusion Criteria
- •Severe disabling chronic medical and/or psychiatric comorbidities determined on a case-by-case basis that prevent safe or adequate participation.
- •Unable to comply with the protocol (either self-selected or indicated during screening that s/he/they could not complete all requested tasks) for reasons that include, but are not limited to, patients with a level of cognitive impairment indicative of dementia, patients with current alcohol or substance abuse, patients with a significant movement disorder that interferes with walking, and patients with severe mental illness (e.g., schizophrenia).
- •Unavailable for follow-up for reasons such as terminal illness and imminent plans to leave the United States (as we have migrant or mobile patients due to their citizenship and work issues).
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Percentage of Participants That Are Adherent to the Intervention (Intervention Adherence)
Time Frame: Assessed after enrollment (baseline) and until pilot study completion (approximately 4 weeks)
As a measure of adherence, the investigator will assess the percentage of participants that complete a majority of the home-based RESET intervention visits.
Percentage of Participants Who Complete the Outcome Assessments Upon Program Completion
Time Frame: Assessed after pilot study completion (approximately 4 weeks)
This is to assess the feasibility of participants enrolled in the study to achieve outcomes assessments upon program completion
Percentage of Participants Who Report Adequate Acceptability of the Intervention
Time Frame: Assessed after pilot study completion (approximately 4 weeks)
The investigator will assess the percentage of participants who report scores ≥4 for their rating of the patient-perceived intervention's acceptability on the Acceptability of Intervention Measure (average of 4 items, each rated on a 1-5 Likert scale; score range: 1-5, with higher scores indicating greater acceptability).
Percentage of Participants Who Report Adequate Feasibility of the Intervention
Time Frame: Assessed after pilot study completion (approximately 4 weeks)
The investigator will assess the percentage of participants who report scores ≥4 for their rating of the patient-perceived intervention's feasibility on the Feasibility of Intervention Measure (average of 4 items, each rated on a 1-5 Likert scale; score range: 1-5, with higher scores indicating greater feasibility).
Percentage of RESET Sessions Administered as Intended
Time Frame: Assessed throughout administration of the pilot study (Up to 4 weeks)
As a measure of intervention fidelity, the investigator will assess the percentage of participants that had a majority of their home-based RESET intervention administered as intended as per completion of a fidelity checklist.
Percentage of Participants Who Report Adequate Appropriateness of the Intervention
Time Frame: Assessed after pilot study completion (approximately 4 weeks)
The investigator will assess the percentage of participants who report scores ≥4 for their rating of the patient-perceived intervention's appropriateness on the Intervention Appropriateness Measure (average of 4 items, each rated on a 1-5 Likert scale; score range: 1-5, with higher scores indicating greater appropriateness).
Secondary Outcomes
- Change in Exercise Sensitivity Questionnaire Score(baseline and after pilot study completion (4 weeks))
- Change in Self-reported Physical Activity(baseline and after pilot study completion (4 weeks))