MedPath

MRI Guided Management of Occlusive Peripheral Arterial Disease

Recruiting
Conditions
Peripheral Vascular Diseases
Registration Number
NCT06782100
Lead Sponsor
The Methodist Hospital Research Institute
Brief Summary

The goal of this observational study is to identify which plaque lesions in patients with peripheral arterial disease are impenetrable and to determine which devices minimize vessel wall injury.

Patients undergoing intervention will have an MRI scan prior to their planned percutaneous vascular intervention to assess the plaque and predict procedural difficulty.

Patients undergoing lower limb amputation due to peripheral arterial disease will have their limbs included into a second arm of the study The limb will undergo an MRI scan to assess the plaque. The investigator will then test two different devices and assess the effects of these devices on the vessel wall.

Detailed Description

Please see attached study protocol.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
175
Inclusion Criteria

A. General Inclusion Criteria:

i. All patients will be ≥ 40 years old with PAD (Rutherford Category 4, 5, 6)

B. Anatomic inclusion criteria:

i. At least 1 target lesion below-the-knee in native vessels in one or both limbs ii. Target lesion reference vessel diameter between 2.0 - 4.0 mm by investigator visual estimate iii. Target lesion with > 50% stenosis by investigator visual estimate

Exclusion Criteria

A. General Exclusion Criteria:

i. Rutherford category 0, 1, 2, 3 of target limb, Failure or refusal to provide written informed consent, MRI Contraindications

B. Anatomic Exclusion Criteria:

ii. Aim 2 only - Chronic total occlusions

Study & Design

Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Design
Not specified
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Patient primary OutcomeIntraprocedural - the outcome is at the time of the procedure, it is not a follow up outcome.

PVI failure due to inability to cross the target plaque with a guidewire.

Amputation Arm OutcomeFrom Experiment and detected during Histological Evaluation (there is no timeframe from this as it is after the experiment on histological analysis)

Presence of dissections on histology (number of dissections i.e. count, idissection score)

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Patient outcome measuresIntraprocedural

1. Plaque-crossing time (seconds),

2. successful target lesion revascularization (yes or no)

3. use of adjunct devices beyond plain balloon angioplasty (record name of device\[s\])

4. injury/dissection of vessel requiring stent (record event title e.g. dissection)

5. plaque embolization (yes/no)

6. number and stiffness of wires and catheters used (record device names)

7. subintimal crossing (yes/no)

8. outcomes after antegrade/retrograde access (successful/unsuccessful)

Amputation Arm OutcomesFrom Experiment and Histologicla Examination

1. Minimal inflation pressure

2. mean luminal gain percentage based on IVUS

3. severity of dissections using iDissection classification and

4. endothelial injury

Patient Outcome MeasureIntraprocedural

Hypothesis: Women will have less MRI-defined hard lesions and plaques that are easier to cross Comparison Groups: Women vs. Men Primary Outcome: PVI failure due to inability to cross the target plaque with a guidewire (record number of hard lesions i.e. count, comparing men and women)

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Houston Methodist Hospital

🇺🇸

Houston, Texas, United States

Houston Methodist Hospital
🇺🇸Houston, Texas, United States
Trisha Roy, MD, PhD
Contact
Janak Lamichhane, MBBS, MBA
Contact
346- 238-2291
jlamichhane@houstonmethodist.org
© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath