A comparative study of PNF(Proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation) stretch vs kaltenborn mobilization technique on pain and disability in patients with adhesive capsulitis-A randomized control trail
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 进行中（未招募）
- 入组人数
- 54
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- NPRS (Numerical pain rating scale)
研究概览
简要总结
AIMS
To find out the effectiveness of proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation Stretch in comparison with kaltenborn mobilization on pain and disability in patients with adhesive capsulitis.
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE
· To compare the effects of proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation Stretch and kaltenborn mobilization technique in patients with adhesive capsulitis.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVE
· 1. To compare the effects of proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretching and kaltenborn mobilization technique in patients with adhesive capsulitis.
· 2.Evaluate proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretching and kaltenborn mobilization technique effectively reduces pain among patients with adhesive capsulitis.
· 3.To assess proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretching and kaltenborn mobilization technique are effective in improving shoulder function among patients with adhesive capsulitis.
Hypothesis
Null Hypothesis
1.There will be no significant effect of proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretch on pain and disability in patients with
adhesive capsulitis.
2.There will be no significant effect of kaltenborn mobilization technique on pain and disability in patients with adhesive capsulitis.
- There will be no significant difference of proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretch compared to kaltenborn mobilization technique on pain and disability in patients with adhesive capsulitis.
Alternate Hypothesis
1.There will be significant effect of proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretch on pain and disability in patients with
adhesive capsulitis.
2.There will be significant effect of kaltenborn mobilization technique on pain and disability in patients with adhesive capsulitis.
- There will be significant difference of proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretch compared to kaltenborn mobilization technique on pain and disability in patients with adhesive capsulitis.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Other
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 30.00 Year(s) 至 60.00 Year(s)（—）
- 性别
- All
入选标准
- •Unilateral limb involvement Subjects with second and third stage of adhesive capsulitis.
排除标准
- •Subjects with post traumatic immobilization Subjects with cognitive impairment Subjects with previous surgery /arthroscopy.
结局指标
主要结局
NPRS (Numerical pain rating scale)
时间窗: After the 4 weeks of intervention application
次要结局
- SPADI(Shoulder Pain And Disability Index)(After the 4 weeks of intervention application)
研究者
Nandini A H
Narayana hrudayalaya institute of physiotherapy