Mnemonic Strategy Versus Spaced Retrieval Training in Those With Mild Cognitive Impairment
- Conditions
- Mild Cognitive Impairment
- Interventions
- Behavioral: spaced retrieval trainingBehavioral: mnemonic strategy training
- Registration Number
- NCT04533204
- Lead Sponsor
- VA Office of Research and Development
- Brief Summary
This study compared two active cognitive interventions to evaluate whether one improved memory more than the other in patients with mild cognitive impairment. Participants were randomized to either memory strategy training or spaced retrieval training and completed memory tests before and after 3 training sessions. Participants returned 1 month after treatment to see how well they remembered the learned information. Brain scans (functional MRI) were collected before and after the interventions to see if training changed the way brain regions were functioning.
- Detailed Description
Individuals with MCI were randomized to 3 sessions of mnemonic strategy or spaced retrieval training that focused on object location associations. Across these training sessions, each group received 9 training trials for each of the 45 trained stimuli. Task-fMRI was acquired before and after training. Memory was again evaluated 1 month after the last training session. The primary outcome measure was memory for the "trained" stimuli while secondary outcome was accuracy for novel stimuli acquired outside of the MRI environment.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 59
-Diagnosis of MCI according to Petersen (2004) criteria, right handed
- Diagnosis of other neurological condition,
- active drug/alcohol abuse/dependence,
- moderate-severe depression or other Axis I diagnoses.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Spaced retrieval training spaced retrieval training Training using spaced retrieval Mnemonic strategy training mnemonic strategy training Training using mnemonic strategies
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Percent of Correct Object Location Associations Assessed up to 1 Month Post-treatment up to 1 month after last training session Change in memory for 45 trained object location associations
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change in Accuracy (vs. Baseline) on Novel Object Location Associations up to 1 month after last training session Change in accuracy for novel object location associations using a touchscreen task; distance measured in cm from actual location
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI
🇺🇸Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States