MedPath

Mnemonic Strategy Versus Spaced Retrieval Training in Those With Mild Cognitive Impairment

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Mild Cognitive Impairment
Interventions
Behavioral: spaced retrieval training
Behavioral: mnemonic strategy training
Registration Number
NCT04533204
Lead Sponsor
VA Office of Research and Development
Brief Summary

This study compared two active cognitive interventions to evaluate whether one improved memory more than the other in patients with mild cognitive impairment. Participants were randomized to either memory strategy training or spaced retrieval training and completed memory tests before and after 3 training sessions. Participants returned 1 month after treatment to see how well they remembered the learned information. Brain scans (functional MRI) were collected before and after the interventions to see if training changed the way brain regions were functioning.

Detailed Description

Individuals with MCI were randomized to 3 sessions of mnemonic strategy or spaced retrieval training that focused on object location associations. Across these training sessions, each group received 9 training trials for each of the 45 trained stimuli. Task-fMRI was acquired before and after training. Memory was again evaluated 1 month after the last training session. The primary outcome measure was memory for the "trained" stimuli while secondary outcome was accuracy for novel stimuli acquired outside of the MRI environment.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
59
Inclusion Criteria

-Diagnosis of MCI according to Petersen (2004) criteria, right handed

Exclusion Criteria
  • Diagnosis of other neurological condition,
  • active drug/alcohol abuse/dependence,
  • moderate-severe depression or other Axis I diagnoses.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Spaced retrieval trainingspaced retrieval trainingTraining using spaced retrieval
Mnemonic strategy trainingmnemonic strategy trainingTraining using mnemonic strategies
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Percent of Correct Object Location Associations Assessed up to 1 Month Post-treatmentup to 1 month after last training session

Change in memory for 45 trained object location associations

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change in Accuracy (vs. Baseline) on Novel Object Location Associationsup to 1 month after last training session

Change in accuracy for novel object location associations using a touchscreen task; distance measured in cm from actual location

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI

🇺🇸

Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath