Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT05686304
NCT05686304CompletedNot Applicable

Effectiveness of Internet-based Self-help Money Management Program in Increasing in Financial Self-efficacy Among the Adult Population With Severe Mental Illness: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Education University of Hong Kong3 sites in 1 country130 target enrollmentStarted: September 1, 2022Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Sponsor
Enrollment
130
Locations
3
Primary Endpoint
Change from Baseline Assessment in Financial Behaviour at Post-Intervention Assessment and Follow-up Assessment

Study Overview

Brief Summary

This experimental study aims to develop an internet-based self-help money management program that improve financial self-efficacy and its associated adverse outcomes among adult population with severe mental illness. In particular, this study compares the efficacy of the internet-delivered self-help money management program with the wait-list control group.

The online money management program course will consist of 4 weekly modules, incorporating the key components of money management and the Model of Human Occupation (MOHO). The program include the concept of money management, money management skill, and risk of financial exploitation. The main component of each module will be presented in video format, quiz, and homework. Materials will be presented interactively to facilitate engagement.

Detailed Description

Money management is necessary for people with severe mental illness (SMI) to live safely in the community. Collective evidence has suggested that mental disorder leads to drift into poverty, is strong. Most of them struggle to meet basic needs with their existing income. Financial instability has been consistently linked to an increased risk of relapse. This experimental study aims to develop an internet-based self-help money management program that improve financial self-efficacy and its associated adverse outcomes among adult population with severe mental illness. Its efficacy will be compared with the wait-list control group. We hypothesized that (1) participants who received a money management program will improve financial self-efficacy after the intervention as compared with the wait-list controls; (2) participants from the money management program will have better financial well-being after the intervention as compared with the wait-list controls.

The online money management program course will consist of 4 weekly modules, incorporating the key components of money management and the Model of Human Occupation (MOHO), including the concept of money management, money management skill, and risk of financial exploitation. Each module will consist of the main component presented in video format, quiz, and homework. Materials will be presented interactively to facilitate engagement.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Supportive Care
Masking
Double (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • Hong Kong residents
  • Age ≥18 years
  • Carrying a diagnosis of mental illness
  • Being able to read Chinese
  • Have a computer, tablet and/or smartphone device with Internet access
  • Willing to give informed consent and comply with the trial protocol

Exclusion Criteria

  • Not provided

Arms & Interventions

Money management group

Experimental

Participants in the money management condition start the 4-week money management program immediately after randomization and complete the post-intervention assessment right after they finish the treatment. They will be invited to participate in an interview after completing the post-intervention assessment.

Intervention: Internet-based self-help money management program (Behavioral)

Waitlist control group

No Intervention

Participants in the waitlist control group will wait for 4 weeks without the money management program and then complete the post-intervention assessment. The waitlist control participants will start a money management program (equivalent to that of the money management group) immediately after completing the post-intervention assessment.

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Change from Baseline Assessment in Financial Behaviour at Post-Intervention Assessment and Follow-up Assessment

Time Frame: Before intervention, Immediately after intervention, and 4 weeks after intervention

Change in financial behaviour is assessed by asking participants to indicate the extent to which they perform six positive financial behaviours in a 5-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree).

Change from Baseline Assessment in Financial Self-Efficacy on the Financial Self-Efficacy Scale at Post-Intervention Assessment and Follow-up Assessment

Time Frame: Before intervention, Immediately after intervention, and 4 weeks after intervention

The Financial Self-Efficacy Scale assess the change in a 5-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree).

Change from Baseline Assessment in Financial Attitude at Post-Intervention Assessment and Follow-up Assessment

Time Frame: Before intervention and Immediately after intervention, and 4 weeks after intervention

Change in financial attitude is assessed by asking participants to indicate their views about performing six positive financial behaviours in a 5-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree).

Change from Baseline Assessment in Financial Well-Being on the CFPB Financial Well-Being Scale at Post-Intervention Assessment and Follow-up Assessment

Time Frame: Before intervention and Immediately after intervention, and 4 weeks after intervention

The CFPB Financial Well-Being Scale assess the change in a 5-point Likert scale, ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (completely).

Secondary Outcomes

  • Change from Baseline Assessment in Psychological Wellbeing on the World Health Organisation-Five Well-Being Index (WHO-5) at Post-Intervention Assessment and Follow-up Assessment(Before intervention and Immediately after intervention, and 4 weeks after intervention)
  • Change from Baseline Assessment in Depressive Symptom on the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) at Post-Intervention Assessment and Follow-up Assessment(Before intervention and Immediately after intervention, and 4 weeks after intervention)
  • Change from Baseline Assessment in Anxiety Symptom on the General Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) at Post-Intervention Assessment and Follow-up Assessment(Before intervention and Immediately after intervention, and 4 weeks after intervention)
  • Change from Baseline Assessment in Quality of Life on the Twelve-Item Short-Form (SF-12) Health Survey at Post-Intervention Assessment and Follow-up Assessment(Before intervention and Immediately after intervention, and 4 weeks after intervention)
  • Treatment satisfaction on the internet (Acceptability of the Internet for delivering online programs) at the Interview after Post-Intervention Assessment(Immediately after Post-Intervention Assessment)
  • Treatment adherence at the Interview after Post-Intervention Assessment(Immediately after Post-Intervention Assessment)
  • Treatment satisfaction at the Interview after Post-Intervention Assessment(Immediately after Post-Intervention Assessment)

Investigators

Sponsor
Education University of Hong Kong
Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

CHAN Ka Shing Kevin

Associate Professor, Head of Department of Psychology

Education University of Hong Kong

Study Sites (3)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials