MedPath

Validation of a French Version of the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM)

Completed
Conditions
Confusion
Delirium
Interventions
Other: Psychiatric evaluation
Other: Geriatric evaluation
Registration Number
NCT01775982
Lead Sponsor
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de N墨mes
Brief Summary

To validate the French version of the CAM, a multicenter diagnostic study will be conducted. The principle of this study is identical to the study of Inouye which initially validated the CAM in 1990. This is to verify the diagnostic properties of the CAM (French version) compared to the gold standard represented by the confused state of psychiatric diagnosis using the DSM.

A representative sample of geriatric patients for whom a delirium is suspected, will be recruited in the various participating centers, patients will undergo two consecutive visits:

* A visit by a geriatrician, during which the confused state of the patient will be evaluated using the French version of the CAM.

* A visit by a psychiatrist during which the diagnosis of confusional state will be evaluated using the gold standard criteria of the DSM IV.

These two evaluations will be conducted on the same day and blinded from each other.

The order of these two procedures will be balanced within each center. This process will allow the calculation of diagnostic parameters of the CAM French version (validation competitive): sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values .

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
102
Inclusion Criteria
  • A family member of the patient, or his/her "trusted person" must have given his/her informed and signed consent
  • The patient must be insured or beneficiary of a health insurance plan
  • Hospitalization in geriatric short stay OR patient consulting at a geriatric assessment center / memory clinic OR geriatric day hospitalization
  • Patients for whom a state of confusion is suspected during the pre-inclusion visit run-in based on the following criteria:
  • Presence of a cognitive function disorder as defined by a score greater than or equal to 3 on the Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire (SPMSQ) (Pfeiffer E, 1975) AND / OR
  • Presence of a mood disorder and / or behavior disorder (regardless of duration) according to the patient's family or caregivers
  • Presence of a caregiver who can answer questionnaires concerning activities of everyday life
Exclusion Criteria
  • The patient is participating in another study
  • The patient is in an exclusion period determined by a previous study
  • The patient's family or "trusted-person" refuses to sign the consent
  • The patient does not understand french
  • Severe aphasia
  • Stay is < = 3 days

Study & Design

Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Design
Not specified
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Study populationPsychiatric evaluationSee inclusion and exclusion criteria. Intervention: Psychiatric evaluation Intervention: Geriatric evaluation A potential intervention order effect will be taken into account by balancing in each center the number of evaluations beginning with the geriatric assessment and those starting with the psychiatric assessment.
Study populationGeriatric evaluationSee inclusion and exclusion criteria. Intervention: Psychiatric evaluation Intervention: Geriatric evaluation A potential intervention order effect will be taken into account by balancing in each center the number of evaluations beginning with the geriatric assessment and those starting with the psychiatric assessment.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
CAM French Version: diagnostic propertiesDay 0

Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Diagnostic properties of alternative algorithms constructed from items of CAM (French version)day 0
Reliability and quality of the french version of the CAMDay 0

Parameters of reliability and quality of the tool:

* Inter-rater Agreement (measured by a coefficient of correlation) between two evaluators: geriatrician and a nurse or psychologist

* Internal consistency of the questionnaire assessed by calculating Cronbach's alpha

* Time required for assessment

* Acceptability by clinicians

* Tolerance of patients

Feasibility of scoring with the French version of the Delirium Indexday 0

Trial Locations

Locations (8)

CHU de Montpellier - Centre Antonin Balmes

馃嚝馃嚪

Montpellier cedex 5, France

APHM - H么pital Sainte-Marguerite

馃嚝馃嚪

Marseille, France

CHU de Rouen - H么pital de Bois-Guillaume

馃嚝馃嚪

Bois Guillaume, France

CHU de Reims - H么pital Maison Blanche

馃嚝馃嚪

Reims, France

CH d'Al猫s

馃嚝馃嚪

Al猫s, France

APHP - H么pital Charles Foix

馃嚝馃嚪

Ivry Sur Seine Cedex, France

CHU de Nice - H么pital de Cimiez

馃嚝馃嚪

Nice, France

CHU de N卯mes - H么pital Universitaire Car茅meau

馃嚝馃嚪

N卯mes Cedex 09, France

漏 Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath