The Influence of Super-Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy on Renal Pelvic Pressure In Vivo

To evaluate the influence of SMP on renal pelvic pressure for the treatment of renal calculi measuring smaller than 25 mm. Investigators will do a single center randomized open-label trial，and investigators plan to perform this study in the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University of China.

Investigators plan to beginning their study at April in 2016 and end at March in 2018.One hundred patients with renal calculi measuring smaller than 25 mm will be enrolled in this study. By simple random sampling technique, patients will be assigned to two 50-patient groups(group 1:F14,group2 :F12).All the patients will be diagnosed definitely before operations with non-contrast CT. Patients with positive preoperative urine culture should be treated with suitable antibiotics based on the culture sensitivity result for at least 72h before SMP. Patients who have negative urine culture should receive a single dose of broad spectrum antibiotic prophylaxis just prior to the procedure.

Surgical technique Routine preoperative preparations are carried out as for conventional percutaneous surgery. Under general anesthesia and with the patient in the lithotomy position, an open-ended 5F ureteral catheter is advanced into the renal pelvis under direct vision. The patient is then turned into the prone position. Percutaneous access is achieved using an 18-gauge coaxial needle to puncture the selected calyx under fluoroscopic or ultrasonic guidance. The success of the puncture is confirmed both by the free flow of the irrigation fluid and by fluoroscopic images. Using a guidewire, the dilatation is carried out with 10 F fascial dilators. Thenan irrigation-suction straight sheath, with the obturator, is advanced over the guidewire and introduced into the pelvicalyceal system. The guidewireis then removed, and the "handle" is connected to the straight sheath. The irrigation port of the irrigation-suction sheath is connected to an irrigation pump. The oblique tube of the sheath is connected to the specimen collection bottle, and the bottle then to the negative pressure aspirator. The irrigation fluid pressure is set as 200-250 mmHg. The suction pressure is controlled to a setting of 100-150 mmHg. The irrigation is delivered through the irrigation channel of the sheath. Thus, a one-way flow is created as the inflow that comes out of the irrigation channel of the sheath is immediately aspirated through the suction conduitof the sheath. Stone fragmentation is accomplished using either holmium laser or pneumatic lithotripter. The tiny pulverized stone fragments will pass around the scope and evacuate through the oblique sluice. If the stone fragments are too large to pass around the scope inside the sheath, the scope can be withdrawn slowly to proximal to the bifurcation in order to create an unobstructed channel for larger fragments evacuation. At the end of the procedure, a single fluoroscopic image is obtained to assess the stone-free status. A Double-J stent is placed only when there is the presence of an obstructing inflammatory ureteric edema, ureteropelvic junction obstruction, or concurrent treatment of ipsilateral ureteric stone with rigid ureteroscope. The sheath is removed, and the wound is either sutured or seal with absorbable gelatin. For patients with significant bleeding or extravasation, a nephrostomy tube is placed.

Measurement of Renal Pelvic Pressure In Vivo While preparing for the SMP, the open-ended ureteric catheter, which had been inserted into the renal collecting system retrogradely, was connected to the invasive blood pressure channel of patient monitor with a baroceptor. The baroceptor was fixed onto the horizontal plane of renal pelvis; after a zero adjustment, the measurement of renal pelvic pressure was in session. A computer collected the renal pelvic pressure data each second. Any factor that caused a high renal pelvic pressure was noticed .

Data collection Data for the 2 groups -demographic characteristics, site of access ,Hb decrease, CRP increase, WBC increase, postoperative pain, operation time, hospital stay, cases of tubeless, postoperative infection complications (systemic inflammatory response syndrome, urosepsis), stone clearance rate and the need for auxiliary treatment are compared.