MedPath

Stroke Process in FEmoral Versus Radial Access

Not Applicable
Conditions
Ischemic Stroke, Acute
Interventions
Procedure: thrombectomy
Registration Number
NCT05225636
Lead Sponsor
Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron Research Institute
Brief Summary

In patients with suspected acute stroke due to large vessel occlusion with indication for endovascular treatment, radial access is just as safe, fast, and effective as femoral access, and it improves the entire stroke treatment process.

Detailed Description

Investigators will compare the procedure times, angiographic results as well as the clinical evolution and the patient's experience during their hospital stay and after discharge, depending on the arterial access practiced for mechanical thrombectomy.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
UNKNOWN
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
100
Inclusion Criteria
  • Patients with high suspicion of ischemic stroke due to large cerebral vessel occlusion defined by NIHSS> 10.
  • Immediate availability of the entire team responsible for endovascular treatment (Neurologist, Neurointerventional physician, Anesthetist, Nursing, Technicians ...)
  • Radial artery diameter ≥2.5 mm
  • Presence of femoral pulse or patency by ultrasonography in its defect.
  • Previous functional independence (mRS 0-2).
Exclusion Criteria
  • Life expectancy of less than 6 months.
  • Intracranial hemorrhage
  • Patients with pre-existing neurological or psychiatric pathology that may confuse future evaluations.
  • No availability for follow-up after 90 days.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Femoral accessthrombectomyThe ischemic stroke treatment will be performed through the femoral artery (as first option)
Radial accessthrombectomyThe ischemic stroke treatment will be performed through the radial artery (as first option)
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
No inferiority of radial access in the recanalization rateImmediate after treatment

To demonstrate the non-inferiority of radial access with respect to femoral access in the recanalization rate (% mTICI 2b-3 in 3 or fewer passes) obtained in patients with large vessel occlusion treated by mechanical thrombectomy.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change of artery access24 hours

Rate of need to change from radial to femoral access and from femoral to radial access

Grades of modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction24 hours

Grade of recanalization after first pass, third pass and at the end of the procedure

Times during hospitalizationAt 24 hours and during first 5 days

Beginning of sitting, ambulation, rehabilitation and total time of hospital admission, need for urinary catheter

No differences in complications in vascular access24 hours

Comparison in frequency of access vessel occlusion, bleeding or presence of pseudoaneurysm

Patient Reported Outcomes5 days

PROMS Patient Reported Outcomes Measures

Patient experience5 days

PREMS Patient Reported Experience Measures

Degree of disability/dependence after a stroke24 hours and at 90 days

modified rankin scale (from 0 to 6, being 0 best and 6 worst)

Trial Locations

Locations (2)

Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron

🇪🇸

Barcelona, Spain

Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron. Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona

🇪🇸

Barcelona, Spain

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath