Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/CTRI/2024/06/069030
CTRI/2024/06/069030Not yet recruitingNot Applicable

Effectiveness of Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy versus Non-descent Vaginal Hysterectomy in women with benign uterine pathologies: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology1 site in 1 country132 target enrollmentStarted: June 25, 2024Last updated:

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Not yet recruiting
Sponsor
Enrollment
132
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
1. Quantitative measure of blood loss intra-operatively

Study Overview

Brief Summary

**Introduction:**The ideal hysterectomy procedure should be minimally invasive, have low morbidity, low health care costs, shorten the length of the hospital stay, and improve patient satisfaction. Therefore, the current study’s objective is to assess and compare the clinical results of two alternative hysterectomy approaches namely Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy (TLH) and Non-Descent Vaginal Hysterectomy (NDVH).

Methodology: A total of 132 women with benign uterine pathologies will be randomized by computer-generated randomization and a sequentially numbered, sealed opaque envelope method will be used for allocation in this single-blinded parallel-group randomized controlled trial. Group A (study group) will be the patients undergoing TLH and Group B (control group) will be the patients undergoing NDVH.

Result: The blood loss in each group will be calculated using a quantitative method of measuring blood loss intraoperatively. The operation time will be noted and the pain at the suture site will be noted immediately post-surgery and on day 2 of the surgery using the Visual Analog Scale. The statistical analysis will include descriptive and inferential analysis to determine the significant difference.

Conclusion: The present study will be comparing and concluding the

effectiveness of TLH and NDVH in women with benign uterine pathologies. This will explore the outcome of the surgery in terms of recovery, morbidity, and cost-effectiveness.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
35.00 Year(s) to 65.00 Year(s) (—)
Sex
Female

Inclusion Criteria

  • Diagnosis of benign uterine pathologies.
  • Uterine size not surpassing 16 weeks of gravid uterus size, with sufficient uterine mobility.
  • Those willing to provide informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Genital neoplasm, cancer, or malignancy
  • Any adnexal pathology
  • Acute pelvic inflammatory disease
  • Uterine prolapse– stage II and above
  • Those who had any medical issues that could have been made worse by pneumoperitoneum or the Trendelenburg position.

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

1. Quantitative measure of blood loss intra-operatively

Time Frame: Immediately post-surgery and on day 2 post surgery

2. Post-operative pain using the Visual Analog Scale

Time Frame: Immediately post-surgery and on day 2 post surgery

Secondary Outcomes

  • Not applicable(Not applicable)

Investigators

Sponsor
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Sponsor Class
Private medical college
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Dr Abhishek Sonkusare

NKP Salve Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre and Lata Mangeshkar Hospital

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials