跳至主要内容
临床试验/CTRI/2022/02/040016
CTRI/2022/02/040016尚未招募不适用

comparing the effects of active release technique versus positional release technique in patients with plantar fasciitis

未提供1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 56 人开始时间: 2022年12月2日最近更新:

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
尚未招募
入组人数
56
试验地点
1
主要终点
Foot and ankle ability measure

研究概览

简要总结

Title: Comparing the effects of Active release technique versusPositional release technique in subjects with Plantar Fasciitis.

Introduction:

Plantar fasciitis is oneof the most common causes of foot pain. Over the years plantar fasciitisis been treated with rest, stretching, myofascial release, etc. Alsoelectrotherapeutic modalities in the form of ultrasound, phonophoresis, laser,microwave diathermy, iontophoresis, cryotherapy, contrast bath have been givenin the past.

Active ReleaseTechniques (ART) is a soft-tissue technique that locates and breaks down thescar tissue and adhesions which cause pain, stiffness, weakness, abnormalsensations, including mechanical dysfunction in the muscles, fascia, and softtissue. ART is used for the treatment of Repetitive strain injuries, as well asfor the improvement of athletic performance.

Positional releasetherapy (PRT) includes placing the involved tissue in an ideal position ofcomfort. The purpose of position of comfort is to reduce the irritability oftender point and to normalize the tissues associated with dysfunction. Thistechnique is proposed to increase muscle flexibility by placing the muscle in ashortened position to promote muscle relaxation.

Active releasetechnique and Positional release technique has been proved separately to beeffective for the treatment of plantar fasciitis in previous studies. But thereis limited study done comparing these two techniques i.e ART and PRT forplantar fasciitis. Hence, the aim of our study is to compare the effectivenessof Active release technique and Positional release technique in subjects withplantar fasciitis.

Aim:  To compare the effects of active release technique versuspositional release technique in subjects with plantar fasciitis.

Objectives:

  1. To assess the effects of active release technique versuspositional release technique on numerical pain rating scale, pressurealgometer, foot and ankle ability measure and ankle dorsiflexion range ofmotion in patients with plantar fasciitis.

  2. Comparison of both groups.

Inclusion criteria:

Acute Plantar Fasciitis,

Age above 18 years,

Windlass test- positive.

Exclusion criteria:

Dermatitis,

History of surgery or any trauma around the foot complex.

Outcome measures:

  1. Numerical Pain Rating Scale- first step pain, at rest, onactivity

  2. Pressure algometer

  3. Foot and ankle ability measure

  4. Ankle ROM- Dorsiflexion (goniometer)

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Not Applicable
盲法
Not Applicable

入排标准

年龄范围
18.00 Year(s) 至 85.00 Year(s)(—)
性别
All

入选标准

  • Acute plantar fasciitis, Age above 18 years, Windlass test- positive.

排除标准

  • Dermatitis, History of fracture or any trauma around the foot complex.

结局指标

主要结局

Foot and ankle ability measure

时间窗: Baseline and after 10 sessions

Ankle ROM- Dorsiflexion (goniometer)

时间窗: Baseline and after 10 sessions

Pressure algometer

时间窗: Baseline and after 10 sessions

Numerical Pain Rating Scale- first step pain, at rest, on activity

时间窗: Baseline and after 10 sessions

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

发起方
未提供

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验