Evaluation of the Buccal Bone Resorption in Immediate SLActive Implant Placement in Thin vs. Thick Buccal Bone Plates: RCT
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Dental Implant
- Sponsor
- Cairo University
- Enrollment
- 30
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- Bucccal bone changes
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- 2 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
The utilization of SLActive implants which allow more rapid osseointgeration with 3 to 4 weeks. will be placed in thin buccal bone as immediate implants to determine the resorption compared to thick buccal bone
Detailed Description
With the increased demand for aesthetics and the expectation of immediate tooth replacement, improving the treatment options in case with hopeless teeth in the esthetic zone by immediate implants is a need by both practitioners and patients. Current guidelines, today, restricting such treatment to only thick (+ or = 1mm) buccal bone plates. However, the literature shows that less than 10% of the community have such criteria, making it a high risk but needed procedure. Soft tissue and bone remodelling after extraction is an inescapable fact. Immediate implant placement cannot prevent soft tissue and bone remodeling around implants (Araújo et al. 2005, Chen et al. 2009), but implant surface treatment and modifications might enhance the maintainability of the supporting structures around the dental implant due to its faster integration, better stimulating the vascular components at the site. This could be tested by the crestal and buccal bone changes, pink esthetic score and ostell readings.
Investigators
Hani Elnahass
Assitant Professor
Cairo University
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Single bounded irrestorable tooth in the esthetic zone that needs to be extracted.
- •Healthy systemic condition.
- •Type I socket with a minimum of 1mm of buccal bone thickness prior to extraction. (Morton et al., 2014)
- •Sufficient bone apical to the socket for implant primary stability. (Morton et al., 2014)
- •Good oral hygiene.
- •Patient accepts a minimum of three-year follow-up period (cooperative patients).
Exclusion Criteria
- •Signs of acute infection related to the area of interest.
- •Patients with parafunctional habits (Lobbezoo et al. 2006 and Roelhing et al. 2016).
- •Smokers (Lambert et al. 2000).
- •Pregnant females.
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Bucccal bone changes
Time Frame: 12 months post loading
standardized Cone beam computed Tomography The radiograph will be taken preoperatively and 12 month after. The pre and post operative cone beams will be compared to each other observing any changes of the buccal bone at 2 , 4 and 6 mm from the crest, the measurements will be in mm
Secondary Outcomes
- Crestal bone changes(12 months post loading)
- Soft tissue thickness(3 months)
- Post operative pain and swelling(1 week)
- Pink aesthetic score(12 months post loading)
- Buccal bone thickness(3 months)
- Postsurgical satisfaction(1 week)
- Implant stability(3 months)