MedPath

Comparing the Ongoing Pregnancy Rate for Vitrification of Day-4 Morula With Day-5 Blast

Not Applicable
Terminated
Conditions
Infertility
Interventions
Other: Morula Vitrification
Registration Number
NCT03787901
Lead Sponsor
Egyptian Foundation of Reproductive Endocrinology
Brief Summary

Comparing the vitrification at Day-4 (morula stage) with the blastocyst stage vitrification outcomes with the transfer of all day 5 after warming seems need evaluation. To the best of our knowledge, there has been no random-controlled trial conducted such comparison. Altogether, this trial is to evaluate the morula stage vitrification to blastocyst vitrification on the ongoing pregnancy rate after ICSI.

Detailed Description

Vitrification of human embryos has been a paradigm-shifting procedure for higher survival rate compared with the slow freezing protocol. The evidence is scarce to support superior results for vitrifying certain stages of preimplantation embryos. Anecdotal evidence suggests that blastocyst vitrification is more forgiving than cleavage stages. However, data obtained from the procedure of assisted shrinkage of blastocysts before vitrification show a higher survival rate, suggesting that fluid accumulation insides the blastocyst can be a barrier for cryoprotectant to reach the cells. Although reassuring, whether facilitating the cryoprotectants transfer to cells by the laser-assisted shrinkage or other modalities is completely safe remains elusive. Moreover, other claims compare between day-3 embryos vitrification and blastocyst stage, suggesting no difference exists.

One of the most critical stages in embryo development is the maternal to zygotic genome activation (MZA), which occurs at the 4 to 8 cell stages. Therefore, it seems the morula stage is still cleavage but passed the MZA. Morula in the most grading system has compaction for all or the majority of cells so if vitrified, the morula stage can bypass the earlier stage of vitrification as well as the need for the artificial shrinkage for blastocyst stage. Therefore, comparing the vitrification at Day-4 (morula stage) with the blastocyst stage vitrification outcomes with the transfer of all day 5 after warming seems need evaluation. To the best of our knowledge, there has been no random-controlled trial conducted such comparison. Altogether, this trial is to evaluate the morula stage vitrification to blastocyst vitrification on the ongoing pregnancy rate after ICSI.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
TERMINATED
Sex
Female
Target Recruitment
53
Inclusion Criteria
  1. Women age of ≥ 18 to ≤ 40
  2. BMI of ≤ 31
  3. Normal responder (≥ 12 antral follicle count (AFC) during basal ultrasound examination) or hyper responder
  4. The freeze-all groups including PCOS, OHSS, or high Progesterone at trigger day
  5. Women who have ≥ 1 year of primary or secondary infertility
  6. Tubal factor (unilateral, bilateral obstruction or salpingectomy)
  7. Fresh semen ejaculates but not frozen or surgically retrieved sperm
  8. Male factor: oligoasthenozoospermia but not globozoospermia or pinhead sperm
  9. Women who are undergoing their first or second ICSI attempts with a previously successful attempt
  10. Women who undergo only freeze-all embryo
  11. Freeze-all for poor endometrium at the fresh cycle
  12. Freeze-all due to abnormal endometrial findings such as polyp or myoma with a decision for freeze all for surgical correction.
  13. Women who have normal endometrial thickness (≥ 8) and echo-pattern at the time of progesterone start in the proposed vitrified warmed cycle
Exclusion Criteria
  1. Women who have uncorrectable uterine pathology or abnormality including submucous myoma
  2. Women or their husbands who have abnormal karyotyping
  3. Women with a history of recurrent abortions or repeated implantation failures
  4. Women who have uncontrolled diabetes
  5. Women with diagnosed or undiagnosed liver or renal disease
  6. Women who had a history of malignancy or borderline pathology
  7. Women who will not meet the inclusion criteria
  8. Women who will refuse to participate in the study
  9. Women with endometriosis
  10. Patient undergoing PGS or PGD
  11. Surgically retrieved, frozen-thawed and pinpoint sperm or globozoospermia
  12. Adenomyosis
  13. Severe medical condition

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Morula Vitrification ArmMorula Vitrification-
Blastocyst Vitrification ArmMorula Vitrification-
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
The ongoing pregnancy rate12 weeks

Continued pregnancy at \> gestational week 12 or more per initiated cycle

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Cumulative clinical pregnancy rateOne year

Sacs with a positive heartbeat on ultrasound at ≥ 7 weeks of gestation per initiated cycle within one year from randomization

Cumulative ongoing pregnancy rateOne year

continued pregnancy after gestational week 12 per initiated cycle within one year from randomization

Implantation rate12 weeks

Sacs with a heartbeat on ultrasound per embryo transferred

Cumulative implantation rateOne year

Sacs with a heartbeat on ultrasound per embryo transferred within one year from randomization

Embryo survival rate after thawingFive days of culture

Blastocyst re-expansion for day 5 vitrified embryo after two hours and blastocyst formation on day 5 for embryo vitrified on day 4

Biochemical pregnancy rate14 days

positive b-hCG at ≥ 14 days following embryo transfer per initiated cycle

Clinical pregnancy rate7 weeks

Sacs with a positive heartbeat on ultrasound at ≥ 7 weeks of gestation per initiated cycle

Twin pregnancy rateOne year

≥ two foetuses with a heartbeat per initiated cycle

Trial Locations

Locations (4)

AlMadina IVF and ICSI Centre

🇪🇬

Alexandria, Egypt

Al Hayat ICSI Centre of Alexandria

🇪🇬

Alexandria, Egypt

Agial

🇪🇬

Alexandria, Egypt

Rahem Fertility Centre of Zagazig

🇪🇬

Zagazig, Egypt

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath