Comparison of supraglottic airway device(AMBU AURAGAIN) versus intubating laryngeal mask airway(FASTRACH LMA) as mode for blind intubatio
Not Applicable
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2023/03/050715
- Lead Sponsor
- Dr Harjeet singh arora
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
1 Age between 18 to 60 years
2 patients with ASA grade 1 and 2 undergoing surgical procedure
3 MPG grade 1 and 2
4 BMI <35kg/m2
Exclusion Criteria
1 Age <18 or >60 years
2 history of acid peptic disease,hiatus hernia,pregnancy
3 laryngeal pathology
4 MPG grade 3 and 4
5 ASA grade 3 and 4
6 BMI >35kg/m2
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method 1 To study the insertion characteristics of the supraglottic device <br/ ><br>a Ease of insertion - insertion at first attempt with no resistance(easy) -difficult insertion or at second attempt(fair) -failed insertion oe insertion not possible(difficult) <br/ ><br>insertion time of individual device <br/ ><br>b Number of attempts of blind tracheal intubationTimepoint: 4 WEEKS
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method 1 Hemodynamic changes(HR,SPO2) <br/ ><br>2 Complications during insertion or removal of device(laryngospasm,blood staining,trauma to lips,teeth,tongue or posterior pharyngeal wall) <br/ ><br>after recovery from anaesthesia(sore throat,dysphagia,dysphonia)Timepoint: hemodynamic parameters will be recorded starting from baseline,1 min,2 min,3min,5min,10min interval till end of surgery