A New Piezoelectric Technique in Third Molar Surgery
- Conditions
- Tooth, ImpactedTooth Extraction Status NosFacial SwellingTooth AvulsionTooth DiseasesPiezoelectric Technique
- Interventions
- Procedure: Piezoelectric surgery
- Registration Number
- NCT06212232
- Lead Sponsor
- Amerigo Giudice
- Brief Summary
The present study aims to analyze the effect of the piezoelectric technique in third molar surgery in terms of facial swelling, trismus and pain in a split-mouth randomized controlled clinical trial
- Detailed Description
The present study aims to analyze the effect of of the piezoelectric technique n third molar surgery in terms of facial swelling, trismus and pain in a split-mouth randomized controlled clinical trial. Facial swelling will be assessed using an innovative three-dimensional digital technique.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 47
- Patients aged 18 to 32 years who required both M3M extractions were recruited
- Good health status
- Indication to surgical extraction of both M3M
- Complete root formation
- Surgical risk level classified as "Conventional" or "Moderate" according to - Daugela et al. classification
- Person under the age of 18 or over 32
- Allergy or contraindications to administration of corticosteroids
- Acute infection in any of the teeth to be extracted
- Patients with chronic liver disease, diabetes, immune system dysfunction, or haematological disease
- Pregnancy or breastfeeding
- History of treatment with antiresorptive drugs
- Chronic kidney disease
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- CROSSOVER
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Experimental: Test Group Piezoelectric surgery Use of a new piezoelectric technique in third molar surgery Traditional: Control Group Piezoelectric surgery Use of the traditional technique in third molar surgery
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Facial swelling quantitative analysis - linear differences Change from baseline (before surgery) at 2 day after surgery and at 7 days after surgery To compare the effectiveness of piezosurgery in reducing facial swelling using quantitative three-dimensional analysis (linear differences measured in cm2) .
Facial swelling quantitative analysis - volumetric differences Change from baseline (before surgery) at 2 day after surgery and at 7 days after surgery To compare the effectiveness of piezosurgery in reducing facial swelling using quantitative three-dimensional analysis ( volumes measured in cm3) .
Facial swelling qualitative analysis Change from baseline (before surgery) at 2 day after surgery and at 7 days after surgery To compare the effectiveness of piezosurgery in reducing facial swelling using qualitative three-dimensional analysis (measured by colorimetric variation given by the overlapping volumes) .
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Trismus analysis Change from baseline (before surgery) at 2 day after surgery and at 7 days after surgery To assess the effects of piezosurgery on trismus (measured in cm)
Pain analysis with Visual analogue scale (VAS) Change from baseline (before surgery) at 2 day after surgery and at 7 days after surgery To assess the effects of piezosurgery on pain (measured by VAS-score from 0 to 10 point, with 10 as the worst outcome.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro
🇮🇹Catanzaro, Italy