MedPath

A New Piezoelectric Technique in Third Molar Surgery

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Tooth, Impacted
Tooth Extraction Status Nos
Facial Swelling
Tooth Avulsion
Tooth Diseases
Piezoelectric Technique
Interventions
Procedure: Piezoelectric surgery
Registration Number
NCT06212232
Lead Sponsor
Amerigo Giudice
Brief Summary

The present study aims to analyze the effect of the piezoelectric technique in third molar surgery in terms of facial swelling, trismus and pain in a split-mouth randomized controlled clinical trial

Detailed Description

The present study aims to analyze the effect of of the piezoelectric technique n third molar surgery in terms of facial swelling, trismus and pain in a split-mouth randomized controlled clinical trial. Facial swelling will be assessed using an innovative three-dimensional digital technique.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
47
Inclusion Criteria
  • Patients aged 18 to 32 years who required both M3M extractions were recruited
  • Good health status
  • Indication to surgical extraction of both M3M
  • Complete root formation
  • Surgical risk level classified as "Conventional" or "Moderate" according to - Daugela et al. classification
Exclusion Criteria
  • Person under the age of 18 or over 32
  • Allergy or contraindications to administration of corticosteroids
  • Acute infection in any of the teeth to be extracted
  • Patients with chronic liver disease, diabetes, immune system dysfunction, or haematological disease
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • History of treatment with antiresorptive drugs
  • Chronic kidney disease

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
CROSSOVER
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Experimental: Test GroupPiezoelectric surgeryUse of a new piezoelectric technique in third molar surgery
Traditional: Control GroupPiezoelectric surgeryUse of the traditional technique in third molar surgery
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Facial swelling quantitative analysis - linear differencesChange from baseline (before surgery) at 2 day after surgery and at 7 days after surgery

To compare the effectiveness of piezosurgery in reducing facial swelling using quantitative three-dimensional analysis (linear differences measured in cm2) .

Facial swelling quantitative analysis - volumetric differencesChange from baseline (before surgery) at 2 day after surgery and at 7 days after surgery

To compare the effectiveness of piezosurgery in reducing facial swelling using quantitative three-dimensional analysis ( volumes measured in cm3) .

Facial swelling qualitative analysisChange from baseline (before surgery) at 2 day after surgery and at 7 days after surgery

To compare the effectiveness of piezosurgery in reducing facial swelling using qualitative three-dimensional analysis (measured by colorimetric variation given by the overlapping volumes) .

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Trismus analysisChange from baseline (before surgery) at 2 day after surgery and at 7 days after surgery

To assess the effects of piezosurgery on trismus (measured in cm)

Pain analysis with Visual analogue scale (VAS)Change from baseline (before surgery) at 2 day after surgery and at 7 days after surgery

To assess the effects of piezosurgery on pain (measured by VAS-score from 0 to 10 point, with 10 as the worst outcome.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro

🇮🇹

Catanzaro, Italy

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath