Discontinuation or Continuation of Immunosuppressive Therapy in Participants With Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease
- Conditions
- Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease
- Interventions
- Biological: Immunosuppressive TherapyOther: Survey Administration
- Registration Number
- NCT03483675
- Lead Sponsor
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center
- Brief Summary
This randomized trial studies how well discontinuation or continuation of immunosuppressive therapy works in treating participants with chronic graft versus host disease. Continuation of immunosuppressive treatment may prevent graft-versus-host disease worsening.
- Detailed Description
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:
I. Assess feasibility of enrolling and randomizing patients with chronic graft versus host disease (GVHD) to discontinuation (standard of care) versus continuation (investigation) of immunosuppressive therapy (IST).
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
I. Assess feasibility of enrolling and randomizing patients who are not local, and evaluate the quality of data received for those patients.
II. Assess whether prolonged IST decreases the need for pulses of high dose IST.
III. Evaluate the effect of prolonged IST on chronic GVHD manifestations and severity, risk of relapse, infection and organ toxicity.
OUTLINE: Participants are randomized to 1 of 2 arms.
ARM I: Participants have their IST tapered and discontinued per the plan.
ARM II: Participants continue to receive a fixed dose IST for an additional 9 months with no taper.
After completion of study treatment, participants are followed up annually.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 21
- Prior first allogeneic stem cell transplant, with any graft source, donor type, and GVHD prophylaxis
- Patients who are on one systemic immunosuppressive agent for chronic GVHD with a plan to withdraw all systemic IST; hydrocortisone or prednisone continued for treatment of adrenal insufficiency is not considered a systemic IST
- No evidence of malignancy at the time of enrollment
- Agree to be evaluated at the transplant center or by local provider every 3 months for 12 months after randomization
- Agreement to be contacted by phone or e-mail for health status evaluation for up to 3 years
- Signed, informed consent
- Inability to comply with study procedures
- Pregancy
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Arm II (continued IST) Survey Administration Participants continue to receive a fixed dose IST for an additional 9 months with no taper. Arm I (discontinued IST) Immunosuppressive Therapy Participants have their IST tapered and discontinued per the plan. Arm II (continued IST) Immunosuppressive Therapy Participants continue to receive a fixed dose IST for an additional 9 months with no taper. Arm I (discontinued IST) Survey Administration Participants have their IST tapered and discontinued per the plan.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Feasibility of Enrolling Patients 22.9 months Descriptive summary of number of patients enrolled on the study (signed consent)
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Incidence of Grade >= 3 Infections Up to 12 months after randomization Incidence of grade \>= 3 infections
Graft Versus Host Disease Manifestations Up to 12 months after randomization New chronic graft versus host disease (GVHD) manifestations and/or worsening of existing manifestations
Enrollment Rate of Participants Who Are Not Local Up to 12 months after randomization Enrollment rate of participants who are not local. Participants who are local defined as those who had all or some study visits completed at the cancer center.
Compliance With Treatment Up to 12 months after randomization Rate of patients following study immunosuppressive therapy management based on study arm (standard taper or continuation of low dose).
Compliance With Data Collection Up to 12 months after randomization Count of surveys completed by physicians and patients
Quality of Data of Participants Who Are Not Local Up to 12 months after randomization Participants who are local defined as those who had all or some study visits completed at the cancer center.
Feasibility of Randomizing Patients 22.9 months Descriptive summary of percentage of patients randomized.
Recurrent Malignancy Up to 12 months after randomization Incidence of relapse of primary disease
Incidence of Grade >= 3 Organ Toxicity Up to 12 months after randomization Incidence of grade \>= 3 organ toxicity
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Fred Hutch/University of Washington Cancer Consortium
🇺🇸Seattle, Washington, United States