A Randomized Trial Comparing Atropine to Atropine Plus a Plano Lens for the Sound Eye As Prescribed Treatments for Amblyopia in Children 3 to <7 Years Old
Overview
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Intervention
- Atropine
- Conditions
- Amblyopia
- Sponsor
- Jaeb Center for Health Research
- Enrollment
- 240
- Locations
- 2
- Primary Endpoint
- Visual Acuity Mean Score in the Amblyopic Eye
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- 9 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
The purpose of the study is:
- To compare the effectiveness and safety of weekend atropine augmented with a plano lens for the sound eye versus weekend atropine alone for moderate amblyopia (20/40 to 20/100) in children 3 to less than 7 years old.
- To provide data on the response of severe amblyopia (20/125 to 20/400) to atropine treatment with and without a plano lens.
Detailed Description
Atropine is an effective treatment of moderate amblyopia. Reduction of the plus sphere for the sound eye is an accepted method of enhancing and possibly accelerating the treatment effect. Demonstrating additional value of the plano lens in terms of speed of improvement will shorten the treatment period, possibly improving child and parental compliance, leading to improved overall outcomes for patients with amblyopia. If the plano lens leads to greater improvement, then there will be less permanent visual impairment in patients with a history of amblyopia. It also is important to determine if the use of a plano lens in conjunction with atropine has a deleterious effect on the sound eye, and if yes, how often this occurs. Little is known about the pharmacologic treatment of severe amblyopia. This study will provide important prospectively determined outcome data at little additional expense. In a study conducted by the Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group, A Randomized Trial Comparing Daily Atropine Versus Weekend Atropine for Moderate Amblyopia, the use of weekend atropine for moderate amblyopia was as effective as daily treatment. Intermittent atropine use (such as using it only on the weekends) has the theoretical potential benefit of the sound eye having some time each week during which cycloplegia is only partial. It is possible that allowing some loss of the cycloplegic effect over the course of each week may be safer for the sound eye. The study has been designed as a simple trial that, other than the type of amblyopia therapy being determined through the randomization process, approximates standard clinical practice. The two treatment regimes for the 18 week primary treatment period are: 1) Atropine 1% once each weekend day in the sound eye and 2) Atropine 1% once each weekend day in the sound eye plus a plano lens for the sound eye.
Investigators
Ray Kraker
Director, PEDIG Coordinating Center
Jaeb Center for Health Research
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Patients must be 3 to less than 7 years old with amblyopia associated with strabismus, anisometropia, or both.
- •Visual acuity in the amblyopic eye must be between 20/40 and 20/400 inclusive, visual acuity in the sound eye 20/40 or better and inter-eye acuity difference \> 3 logMAR lines.
- •Spectacles, if needed, must be worn for at least 16 weeks or until visual acuity documented to be stable.
Exclusion Criteria
- •Atropine treatment within 6 months of enrollment and other amblyopia treatment of any type (other than normal spectacle lenses) used within one month of enrollment
- •No myopia in amblyopic eye
Arms & Interventions
Atropine
Atropine 1% once each weekend day in the sound eye
Intervention: Atropine
Atropine plus plano
Atropine 1% once each weekend day in the sound eye plus a plano lens for the sound eye
Intervention: Atropine
Atropine plus plano
Atropine 1% once each weekend day in the sound eye plus a plano lens for the sound eye
Intervention: Plano Lens
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Visual Acuity Mean Score in the Amblyopic Eye
Time Frame: 18 weeks
Visual acuity is measured in each eye using the Amblyopia Treatment Study (ATS) visual acuity testing protocol at 18 weeks resulting in an Snellen equivalent acuity score that can range from 20/16 to 20/800. This visual acuity score is converted to logMAR (log of min angle of resolution) for statistical analysis. 20/16=-0.1 logMAR; best 20/20=0.0 logMAR; 20/25=0.1; 20/32=0.2; 20/40=0.3; 20/50=0.4; 20/63=0.5; 20/80=0.6; 20/100=0.7; 20/125=0.8; 20/160=0.9; 20/200=1.0; 20/250=1.1; 20/320=1.2; 20/400=1.3; 20/500=1.4; 20/640=1.5; 20/800=1.6; worst
Visual Acuity Distribution in the Amblyopic Eye
Time Frame: 18 weeks
Visual acuity is measured in each eye using the Amblyopia Treatment Study (ATS) visual acuity testing protocol at 18 weeks resulting in a Snellen acuity score that can range from 20/16 to 20/800. This visual acuity score is converted to logMAR (log of min angle of resolution) for statistical analysis. 20/16=-0.1 logMAR; best 20/20=0.0 logMAR; 20/25=0.1; 20/32=0.2; 20/40=0.3; 20/50=0.4; 20/63=0.5; 20/80=0.6; 20/100=0.7; 20/125=0.8; 20/160=0.9; 20/200=1.0; 20/250=1.1; 20/320=1.2; 20/400=1.3; 20/500=1.4; 20/640=1.5; 20/800=1.6; worst
Mean Change in Visual Acuity in the Amblyopic Eye
Time Frame: baseline to 18 weeks
Acuity is measured in each eye using the Amblyopia Treatment Study (ATS) visual acuity testing protocol at baseline and at 18wks resulting in a Snellen acuity score that can range from 20/16 to 20/800. The score is converted to logMAR (log of min angle of resolution) for statistical analysis, and a difference between the scores is calculated. A positive difference indicates acuity was better at 18wks than at baseline; a negative difference indicates acuity was worse at 18wks than at baseline.
Distribution of Change in Visual Acuity in the Amblyopic Eye
Time Frame: baseline to 18 weeks
Acuity is measured in each eye using the Amblyopia Treatment Study (ATS) visual acuity testing protocol at baseline and at 18wks resulting in a Snellen acuity score that can range from 20/16 to 20/800. The score is converted to logMAR (log of min angle of resolution) for statistical analysis, and a difference between the scores is calculated. A positive difference indicates acuity was better at 18wks than at baseline; a negative difference indicates acuity was worse at 18wks than at baseline.
Secondary Outcomes
- Visual Acuity Distribution in the Sound Eye(18 weeks)
- Randot Preschool Stereoacuity at 18 Weeks- Anisometropic Participants Only(18 weeks)
- Randot Preschool Stereoacuity at 18 Weeks- Participants With All Causes of Amblyopia(18 weeks)
- Mean Change in Visual Acuity in the Sound Eye(baseline to 18 weeks)
- Distribution of Change in Visual Acuity in the Sound Eye(baseline to 18 weeks)