MedPath

Comparative Effectiveness of Tirzepatide Versus Semaglutide in Individuals With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction

Active, not recruiting
Conditions
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
HFpEF - Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction
Interventions
Registration Number
NCT06914141
Lead Sponsor
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Brief Summary

Investigators are building an empirical evidence base for real-world data through large-scale emulation of randomized controlled trials. The investigators' goal is to understand for what types of clinical questions real world data analyses can be conducted with confidence and how to implement such studies.

Detailed Description

This is a non-randomized, non-interventional study that is part of the Randomized Controlled Trials Duplicated Using Prospective Longitudinal Insurance Claims: Applying Techniques of Epidemiology (RCT DUPLICATE) initiative (www.rctduplicate.org) of the Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School. It is intended to assess the comparative effectiveness of tirzepatide vs semaglutide after emulating the pivotal RCTs of each drug used to support regulatory approval in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (SUMMIT and STEP-HFpEF DM trials).This comparative effectiveness target trial described below draws from eligibility criteria from the SUMMIT and STEP-HFpEF DM trials. Although many features of the target trial cannot be directly replicated in healthcare claims, key design features, including outcomes, exposures, and inclusion/exclusion criteria, were selected to proxy those features from the target trial. Randomization cannot be achieved in healthcare claims data but was proxied through a statistical balancing of measured covariates according to standard practice.

The database study will be a new-user active-comparative study, conducted using 2 national United States claims databases, where we compare the effect of tirzepatide vs semaglutide on the composite end point of all-cause mortality or heart failure hospitalization. Clinical guidelines during the study period recommended both agents for the same indications of glucose lowering and weight reduction. Indication for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction has not been granted for both drugs during the study period.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
28118
Inclusion Criteria
  • Heart failure
  • BMI > 27.0 kg/m2
  • History of type 2 diabetes mellitus
  • LVEF ≥ 45%
  • ≥ 18 years old, male or female sex
Exclusion Criteria
  • Prior treatment with any GLP-1-RA
  • History of type 1 diabetes mellitus
  • End-stage renal disease or chronic or intermittent haemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis
  • History of bariatric surgery
  • History of nursing home admission
  • Pregnant female or breastfeeding
  • Uncontrolled and potentially unstable diabetic retinopathy or maculopathy
  • Treatment with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion
  • Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 or medullary thyroid carcinoma
  • Have a history of an active or untreated malignancy or are in remission from a clinically significant malignancy (other than basal- or squamous-cell skin cancer, in situ carcinoma of the cervix, or in situ prostate cancer) for less than 5 years

Study & Design

Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Design
Not specified
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
TirzepatideTirzepatideNew use of tirzepatide dispensing claim is used as the exposure.
SemaglutideSemaglutideNew use of semaglutide dispensing claim is used as the reference.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Composite of all-cause mortality or heart failure hospitalizationThrough study completion (1 day after cohort entry date until the first of outcome or censoring)

To evaluate the comparative effect of tirzepatide vs semaglutide on all-cause mortality or heart failure hospitalization in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Composite of all-cause mortality or all-cause mortality or a worsening heart failure event (exacerbated symptoms of heart failure resulting in hospitalization, intravenous diuretic therapy in an urgent care setting).Through study completion (1 day after cohort entry date until the first of outcome or censoring)

To evaluate the comparative effect of tirzepatide vs semaglutide on all-cause mortality or worsening heart failure events in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

Worsening heart failure event (exacerbated symptoms of heart failure resulting in hospitalization or intravenous diuretic therapy in an urgent care setting).Through study completion (1 day after cohort entry date until the first of outcome or censoring)

To evaluate the comparative effect of tirzepatide vs semaglutide on worsening heart failure event (exacerbated symptoms of heart failure resulting in hospitalization or intravenous diuretic therapy in an urgent care setting) in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

Intravenous diuretic therapy in an urgent care settingThrough study completion (1 day after cohort entry date until the first of outcome or censoring)

To evaluate the comparative effect of tirzepatide vs semaglutide on intravenous diuretic therapy in an urgent care setting in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

Hospitalization for heart failureThrough study completion (1 day after cohort entry date until the first of outcome or censoring)

To evaluate the comparative effect of tirzepatide vs semaglutide on hospitalization for heart failure in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

All-cause mortalityThrough study completion (1 day after cohort entry date until the first of outcome or censoring)

To evaluate the comparative effect of tirzepatide vs semaglutide on all-cause mortality in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

Urinary tract infectionThrough study completion (1 day after cohort entry date until the first of outcome or censoring)

To evaluate the comparative effect of tirzepatide vs semaglutide on urinary tract infection in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

Serious bacterial infectionThrough study completion (1 day after cohort entry date until the first of outcome or censoring)

To evaluate the comparative effect of tirzepatide vs semaglutide on serious bacterial infection in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

Gastrointestinal adverse eventsThrough study completion (1 day after cohort entry date until the first of outcome or censoring)

To evaluate the comparative effect of tirzepatide vs semaglutide on gastrointestinal adverse events in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Brigham and Women's Hospital

🇺🇸

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath