Comparing Platelet Rich Plasma and Corticosteroid for Military & Civilian Patients With Glenohumeral Osteoarthritis
- Conditions
- CorticosteroidPainOsteoarthritis of the ShoulderPRP
- Interventions
- Biological: Delayed Platelet Rich Plasma Injection After Corticosteroid Injection FailureBiological: Corticosteroid InjectionBiological: Platelet Rich Plasma Injection
- Registration Number
- NCT05160441
- Lead Sponsor
- Walter Reed National Military Medical Center
- Brief Summary
Shoulder arthroplasty provides successful improvement in pain and function for the treatment of end stage osteoarthritis (OA) of the shoulder in the older patient population (Sanchez 2008, Sampson 2010, Kon 2012, Fitzpatrick 2017). However, the optimal non-operative treatment for shoulder OA in the young active duty and civilian populations has yet to be determined. Although corticosteroid injections (CSI) are a viable option with diagnostic and short-term therapeutic benefit in glenohumeral OA, steroid does little to address the underlying pathology and confers risk of adjacent tendon failure (Kon 2009, Gosens 2011, Monto 2014, Tietze 2014). Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) derived from autologous blood, however, has the potential to enhance soft tissue healing as previously observed in muscles and tendons (Sanchez 2005, Randelli 2008, Hall 2009). PRP contains growth factors purported to safely facilitate local tissue regeneration as corroborated in multiple clinical studies investigating tendinopathy (Virchenko 2006, Kesikburun 2013, Fitzpatrick 2017, Schwitzguebel 2019). PRP is a promising concept to bridge the gap between conventional non-operative measures and surgical arthroscopy or arthroplasty options in a high functioning patient population with refractory disease. However, clinical literature elucidating the effects of intra-articular leukocyte-poor PRP (LP-PRP) injections in large joint degenerative OA has been slower to emerge, lacking substantiated data due to small sample sizes and treatment variability. Therefore, high level evidence-based studies remain critical in ascertaining the therapeutic value and clinical efficacy of LP-PRP in glenohumeral OA in order to establish standard of care protocols and guide systematic implementation.
- Detailed Description
Shoulder arthroplasty provides successful improvement in pain and function for the treatment of end stage osteoarthritis (OA) of the shoulder in the older patient population (Sanchez 2008, Sampson 2010, Kon 2012, Fitzpatrick 2017). However, the optimal non-operative treatment for shoulder OA in the young active duty and civilian populations has yet to be determined. Although corticosteroid injections (CSI) are a viable option with diagnostic and short-term therapeutic benefit in glenohumeral OA, steroid does little to address the underlying pathology and confers risk of adjacent tendon failure (Kon 2009, Gosens 2011, Monto 2014, Tietze 2014). Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) derived from autologous blood, however, has the potential to enhance soft tissue healing as previously observed in muscles and tendons (Sanchez 2005, Randelli 2008, Hall 2009). PRP contains growth factors purported to safely facilitate local tissue regeneration as corroborated in multiple clinical studies investigating tendinopathy (Virchenko 2006, Kesikburun 2013, Fitzpatrick 2017, Schwitzguebel 2019). PRP is a promising concept to bridge the gap between conventional non-operative measures and surgical arthroscopy or arthroplasty options in a high functioning patient population with refractory disease. However, clinical literature elucidating the effects of intra-articular leukocyte-poor PRP (LP-PRP) injections in large joint degenerative OA has been slower to emerge, lacking substantiated data due to small sample sizes and treatment variability. Therefore, high level evidence-based studies remain critical in ascertaining the therapeutic value and clinical efficacy of LP-PRP in glenohumeral OA in order to establish standard of care protocols and guide systematic implementation.
Although commonly used corticosteroid injections have shown some clinical benefit, there are known deleterious effects from steroid use, which include accelerated osteoarthritis progression, cartilage toxicity, and increased risk of septic arthritis. In addition to this, multiple studies demonstrate corticosteroids confers risk of adjacent tendon failure (Kon 2009, Gosens 2011, Monto 2014, Tietze 2014). There is also a concern that multiple corticosteroid injections increase the risk of fat atrophy, skin pigment changes, and tissue thinning if placed incorrectly in the more superficial tissue of the shoulder. These negative findings associated with corticosteroid injections have prompted ongoing research into alternative orthobiologic treatments that provide short to medium duration benefit for patients with osteoarthritis.
Conversely, Leukocyte-Poor Platelet-Rich Plasma (LP-PRP), derived from autologous blood, has demonstrated safety and efficacy in multiple pre-clinical, randomized controlled clinical trials, and meta-analysis studies in the other large joints, causing slow acceptance in the medical community to utilize this as a treatment option, despite its increased cost compared to corticosteroid injection (Campbell 2015, Cavallo 2014, Lai 2015, Laudy 2015, Patel 2013, Smith 2016, Tietze 2014, Piuzzi 2019). However, clinical literature elucidating the effects of intraarticular leukocyte-poor PRP (LP-PRP) injections in shoulder joint degenerative OA has been slower to emerge, lacking substantiated data due to small sample sizes and treatment variability. Therefore, high level evidence-based studies remain critical in ascertaining the therapeutic value and clinical efficacy of LP-PRP in glenohumeral OA in order to establish standard of care protocols and guide systematic implementation. PRP is a promising concept to bridge the gap between conventional non-operative measures and surgical arthroscopy or arthroplasty options in a high functioning patient population with refractory disease.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 50
- DEERS eligible
- Male or female, aged 18 to 70 years (inclusive)
- Presenting symptoms of shoulder pain caused by mild to moderate Shoulder OA as defined by Samilson Prieto criteria on a standard anterior-posterior (AP) Xray series
- BMI < 40
- Willing and able to give voluntary informed consent to participate in this investigation
- Glenohumeral joint osteoarthritis that has been refractory to standard care treatments
- Patients who have received shoulder intraarticular or subacromial injection(s) in the last 3 months
- Patients who have undergone arthroscopic surgery on the study shoulder within the past year
- Patients who have undergone arthroplasty on the study shoulder
- Diabetes (Type 1 or II)
- Inflammatory arthropathies
- Fibromyalgia or chronic fatigue syndrome
- Female patient who is pregnant or nursing
- Patients taking narcotics
- Patients with planned deployment or separation from the military within 12 months
- Any other serious medical condition(s) that might preclude optimal outcome and/or interfere with participation such as intra-articular sepsis, bacteremia, fracture, joint instability, rheumatoid arthritis, osteoporosis, cancer, and coagulopathy
- Patients who have had an adverse reaction to a previous corticosteroid or PRP injection either documented in the medical record or shared by the patient during screening
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Delayed Platelet Rich Plasma Injection Group upon Corticosteroid Injection Failure Delayed Platelet Rich Plasma Injection After Corticosteroid Injection Failure If a participant does not have any benefit from the corticosteroid injection by the six-week follow-up time point, then that participant will be eligible for a platelet rich plasma injection. Corticosteroid Injection Group Corticosteroid Injection 5cc Normal Saline + 2cc 10 mg/ml Triamcinolone Acetonide (Kenalog) Platelet Rich Plasma Injection Group Platelet Rich Plasma Injection Minimum 2cc Leukocyte Poor Platelet Rich Plasma
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change in range of motion (ROM) from before injection to after injection Pre-injection (baseline) and then post-injection at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months Testing the range of motion (ROM) of the shoulder in different directions. If movement in a specific direction is painful or limited, this may signify that pathology is present in a specific structure of the shoulder. Common ROM tests include: forward flexion, abduction, cross-body adduction, external rotation, extension, internal rotation, scapular motion
Change in the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) from before injection to after injection Pre-injection (baseline) and then post-injection at 3 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months A tool used to help a person rate the intensity of certain sensations and feelings, such as pain. The visual analog scale for pain is a straight line with one end meaning no pain and the other end meaning the worst pain imaginable.
Change in the Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey (VR-12) from before injection to after injection Pre-injection (baseline) and then post-injection at 3 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months The VR-12 comprises 12 questions that correspond to eight domains of health, including general health perceptions, physical functioning, role limitations because of physical problems, role limitations because of emotional problems, bodily pain, vitality, social functioning, and mental health.
Change in the Western Ontario Osteoarthritis Shoulder Index (WOOS) from before injection to after injection Pre-injection (baseline) and then post-injection at 3 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months The WOOS is a patient-administrated, disease-specific questionnaire for measurement of the quality-of-life of patients with osteoarthritis.7 It provides scores on four domains: (1) physical symptoms; (2) sport, recreation, and work; (3) lifestyle; and (4) emotions. Each question is answered using a visual analog scale with a possible score ranging from 0 to 100. There are 19 questions, and the total score ranges from 0 to 1900. A score of 1900 signifies that the patient has an extreme decrease in the shoulder-related quality of life, whereas a score of 0 signifies that the patient has no decrease in shoulder-related quality of life.
Change in the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) from before injection to after injection Pre-injection (baseline) and then post-injection at 3 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months The SANE score is a validated patient reported outcome measure. It is a single question score that asks, "how would you rate your condition today as a percentage of normal (0% to 100% scale with 100% being normal)?" The SANE score is collected as standard of care.
Change in the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Form (ASES) from before injection to after injection Pre-injection (baseline) and then post-injection at 3 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months The ASES is a 100-point scale that consists of two dimensions: pain and activities of daily living. There is one pain scale worth 50 points and ten activities of daily living worth 50 points
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Walter Reed National Military Medical Center
🇺🇸Bethesda, Maryland, United States