Study of Lacosamide as an Adjunctive Drug Treatment for Epilepsy in Patients With Brain Tumors
- Conditions
- Brain Tumor Related Epilepsy (BTRE)
- Registration Number
- NCT02276053
- Lead Sponsor
- UCB BIOSCIENCES GmbH
- Brief Summary
This study is being conducted to find out whether lacosamide (a drug to treat epilepsy) is effective in routine clinical practice for patients with epilepsy caused by a brain tumor.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 93
- Patient has never been treated with lacosamide (LCM) prior to this non-interventional study (NIS) or treatment with LCM for the first time started no earlier than 7 days prior to enrollment in this NIS
- The decision by the treating physician to prescribe LCM falls within current standard clinical practice, and the treatment decision is clearly separated from the decision to consider inclusion of the patient in the NIS
- A Patient Data Consent form is signed and dated by the patient and/or by the parent(s) or legal representative
- Patient is a male or female โฅ 16 years of age
- Patient must have a diagnosis of brain tumor-related epilepsy (BTRE) secondary to low-grade glioma (World Health Organization Grade 1 to 2 at time of enrollment)
- Patient has a retrospective Baseline seizure frequency of at least 1 partial-onset seizure in the 8 weeks prior to Visit 1 (enrollment/ Baseline visit)
- Patient does not have a previous diagnosis of epilepsy before tumor onset
- Patient does not have brain metastases
- Patient has a Karnofsky performance status scale index โฅ 60 %
- Patient is currently taking only 1-2 Baseline anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs) for epilepsy, other than LCM
- Patient has received a maximum of 4 different lifetime AEDs ever before entering the NIS
- N/A
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Percentage of Patients With Response at the End of the 6-month Observation Period Visit 1 (Baseline) to Visit 3 (Month 6 or end of Observation Period) A responder is a patient experiencing a 50 % or greater reduction in partial onset seizure frequency from Visit 1 (Baseline) to Visit 3 (Month 6 or end of Observation Period)
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Rating at Visit 3 Visit 3 (Month 6 or end of Observation Period) The Patient Global Impression of Change scale is a seven-point scale for patients to rate their general health status at the end of the study compared to how they felt before entering the study. Scores 1 to 3 mean improvement, score 4 means no change, and scores 5 to 7 mean worsening.
The category 'Improved' represents the sum of Very Much Improved, Much Improved, and Minimally Improved.
The category 'Worsened' represents the sum of Minimally Worse, Much Worse, and Very Much Worse.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Percentage of Patients With Seizure-free Status (Yes/No) at the End of the 6-month Observational Period Visit 3 (Month 6 or end of Observation Period) Percentage of patients achieving a seizure-free status at the end of the 6-month Observation Period.
Percentage of Patients With Retention on Lacosamide (LCM) at the End of the 6-month Observation Period Visit 3 (Month 6 or end of Observation Period) The retention rate was defined as the percentage of patients remaining in the study and on Lacosamide treatment for 6 months (6 month retention rate).
Time to Discontinuation of Lacosamide (LCM) Treatment From the Date of First Dose of LCM From first dose to discontinuation, over a 6-month Observation Period Time between first dose of LCM to discontinuation of LCM treatment was measured in days.
Change From Visit 1 (Baseline) to Visit 3 (Month 6 or End of Observation Period) in the 5 Level EuroQol-5 Dimension Quality of Life Assessment (EQ-5D-5L) Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score Visit 1 (Baseline) to Visit 3 (Month 6 or end of Observation Period) EQ-5D-5L: 5 Level EuroQol-5 Dimension Quality of Life Assessment is a patient-completed questionnaire for patients to rate their quality of life status in five questions and a 0 (no pain) - 100 (worst pain) score vertical visual analogue scale. The Change from Baseline is calculated for this endpoint, negative values indicate improvement and positive values indicate worsening.
Actual Change From Visit 1 (Baseline) to Visit 3 (Month 6 or End of Observation Period) in Seizure Frequency (Seizures Per 28 Days) Visit 1 (Baseline) to Visit 3 (Month 6 or end of Observation Period) The actual change in seizure frequency from Baseline to Month 6 is calculated as the seizure frequency at Month 6 minus the seizure frequence at Baseline.
The seizure frequency at each time point is calculated as number of seizures per 28 days.Change From Visit 1 (Baseline) to Visit 3 (Month 6 or End of Observation Period) in the 5 Level EuroQol-5 Dimension Quality of Life Assessment (EQ-5D-5L) Change in Utility as Converted From the 5 Dimensions Visit 1 (Baseline) to Visit 3 (Month 6 or end of Observation Period) EQ-5D-5L: 5 Level EuroQol-5 descriptive system comprises the following five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression with five response levels for each dimension: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems. This 5-dimension health status is converted into a numerical utility value using the UK value set, as per EuroQOL guidelines. The utility score ranges from 0 to 1 (0=worst imaginable health state, 1=best imaginable health state). The Change from Baseline is calculated for this endpoint, negative values indicate worsening and positive values indicate improvement.
Change From Visit 1 (Baseline) to Visit 3 (Month 6 or End of Observation Period) in the M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory - Brain Tumor (MDASI-BT) Visit 1 (Baseline) to Visit 3 (Month 6 or end of Observation Period) MDASI-BT is a 2-part patient completed questionnaire where patients have to answer 22 questions about their brain tumor-related symptoms and 6 questions about how these symptoms interfere with their life. The mean core symptom severity is derived as the mean of the 13 core symptom items, the mean module symptom severity is derived as the mean of the 9 brain tumor specific symptom items and the mean total symptom severity is derived as the mean of all 22 symptom items. The mean interference is derived as the mean of the 6 interference items. For each score, at least 50% of the items needs to be answered for the score to be calculated. Mean core, mean module and mean total symptom severity scores are ranging from 0 to 10 (0=not present 10=as bad as you can imagine). Mean interference score is ranging from 0 to 10 (0= did not interfere 10= interfered completely). The Change from Baseline is calculated, negative values indicate improvement, positive values indicate worsening.
Percentage Change From Baseline in Seizure Frequency Visit 1 (Baseline) to Visit 3 (Month 6 or end of Observation Period) The percentage change from Baseline to Month 6 in seizure frequency is the actual change in seizure frequency for this period compared to the Baseline seizure frequency, which is considered 100 %.
Discontinuation Rate of Lacosamide (LCM) Due to Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs) Visit 1 (Baseline) to Visit 3 (Month 6 or end of Observation Period) Discontinuation rate due to ADRs is the number of patients that discontinued from the study and from LCM treatment due to ADRs during the 6 months of observation.
Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) Rating at Visit 3 (Month 6 or End of Observation Period) Visit 3 (Month 6 or end of Observation Period) The Clinical Global Impression of Change is a seven-point scale for the treating physician to rate the patient's general health status at the end of the study compared to how the patient felt before entering the study. Scores 1 to 3 mean improvement, score 4 means no change, and scores 5 to 7 mean worsening.
The category 'Improved' represents the sum of Very Much Improved, Much Improved, and Minimally Improved.
The category 'Worsened' represents the sum of Minimally Worse, Much Worse, and Very Much Worse.Discontinuation Rate of Lacosamide (LCM) Due to Lack of Effectiveness Visit 1 (Baseline) to Visit 3 (Month 6 or end of Observation Period) Discontinuation rate due to lack of effectiveness is the number of patients that discontinued from the study and from LCM treatment due to lack of effectiveness during the 6 months of observation.
Trial Locations
- Locations (24)
337
๐ซ๐ทLille, France
334
๐ซ๐ทLyon Cedex, France
491
๐ฉ๐ชBonn, Germany
335
๐ซ๐ทParis Cedex 13, France
493
๐ฉ๐ชFreiburg, Germany
494
๐ฉ๐ชTรผbingen, Germany
394
๐ฎ๐นMilano, Italy
391
๐ฎ๐นPerugia, Italy
392
๐ฎ๐นRoma, Italy
396
๐ฎ๐นRoma, Italy
395
๐ฎ๐นSan Fermo Della Battaglia, Italy
393
๐ฎ๐นTorino, Italy
341
๐ช๐ธBadalona, Spain
443
๐ฌ๐งEdgbaston, United Kingdom
344
๐ช๐ธBarcelona, Spain
442
๐ฌ๐งLondon, United Kingdom
492
๐ฉ๐ชRegensburg, Germany
398
๐ฎ๐นAncona, Italy
397
๐ฎ๐นLecco, Italy
311
๐ณ๐ฑAmsterdam, Netherlands
312
๐ณ๐ฑLeidschendam, Netherlands
314
๐ณ๐ฑTilburg, Netherlands
399
๐ฎ๐นVenezia, Italy
441
๐ฌ๐งEdinburgh, United Kingdom