Comparative Effectiveness of Artificial Tears With and Without Preservatives in Patients With Dry Eye Disease: A Randomized Clinical Trial
试验速览
- 阶段
- 4 期
- 状态
- 尚未招募
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 80
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) Score
研究概览
简要总结
Dry Eye Disease (DED) is a common, chronic ocular surface disorder characterized by tear film instability, ocular discomfort, and visual disturbance. Artificial tears are the first-line treatment for DED; however, many formulations contain preservatives such as benzalkonium chloride (BAK) and stabilized oxychloro complex (SOC) which may cause ocular surface toxicity with long-term use. Preservative-free artificial tears are considered safer alternatives, but comparative clinical evidence from Nepal is limited. This study aims to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of preservative-free versus preserved carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) artificial tears in patients with Dry Eye Disease. This will be a hospital-based, randomized, double-blinded controlled clinical trial conducted in the ophthalmology outpatient department of a tertiary care hospital in Nepal. A total of 80 adult patients diagnosed with Dry Eye Disease will be enrolled and randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to receive either preservative-free CMC artificial tears or preserved CMC artificial tears for a duration of eight weeks. Participant, investigators, outcome assessors and data analysts will remain blinded to minimize assessment bias. Baseline assessments will include the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire, Tear Film Break-Up Time (TBUT), Schirmer's test (without anesthesia), and corneal fluorescein staining. These outcomes will be reassessed at four and eight weeks. Safety and tolerability will be evaluated by documenting patient-reported adverse effects. Data will be analyzed using appropriate statistical methods, with a p-value of less than 0.05 considered statistically significant. The study is expected to demonstrate superior safety and improved ocular surface outcomes with preservative-free artificial tears compared to preserved formulations. Findings from this research will provide local evidence to guide rational prescribing practices and improve the management of Dry Eye Disease in Nepal.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Supportive Care
- 盲法
- Triple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator)
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Age ≥18 years
- •Clinical diagnosis of Dry Eye Disease (OSDI >13 and TBUT <10 seconds)
- •Willingness to provide written informed consent
排除标准
- •Contact lens use
- •Active ocular infection or inflammation
- •History of ocular surgery within the past 6 months
- •Use of systemic immunosuppressive therapy
研究组 & 干预措施
Patients with DED receiving CMC without preservative
40 patients will receive drops in the eye
干预措施: Preservative free Carboxy methyl cellulose (Drug)
结局指标
主要结局
Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) Score
时间窗: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks
Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) Score. The OSDI is a 12-item questionnaire that assesses dry eye symptoms and their impact on vision-related functioning. Total scores range from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 100. Higher scores indicate more severe dry eye symptoms and a worse outcome.
次要结局
- Tear Film Break-Up Time (TBUT)(From enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks)
- Schirmer's Test (without anesthesia)(From enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks)
- Corneal Fluorescein Staining Score(From enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks)
研究者
Damodar Sharma
Principal Investigator, Head of Department, Department of Pharmacology,
Pokhara Academy of Health Sciences, Western Regional Hospital
