Comparison Between Two Narrative Medicine Approaches in Type 1 Diabetes (T1D): a Prospective Randomized Study
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Type1diabetes
- Sponsor
- Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
- Enrollment
- 87
- Primary Endpoint
- Change from baseline IPQR (Illness Perception Questionnaire) score at 3 months
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- 8 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
a randomized prospective study aims at comparing the impact of a "living theater" session with a simple "writing workshop " on emotional distress (Problem Areas in Diabetes Questionnaire PAID) and illness perception ( Illness Perception Questionnaire IPQR) during a 5 day education course
Detailed Description
This randomized prospective pilot study aims at comparing the impact of a "living theater" session with a simple "writing workshop " on emotional distress (Problem Areas in Diabetes Questionnaire PAID) and illness perception ( Illness Perception Questionnaire IPQR) during a 5 day education course on Functional Insulin Therapy (FIT). Questionaries at T0 (course day 1 ) and T1 (3 months later). qualitative interviews in a sub group of patients random G1 and G2 subgroup at T1, with a general inductive approach to capture all representations
Investigators
Agnes Hartemann
head of the diabetes department at the university hospital Pitié Salpetrière Paris
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •type 1 diabetes
Exclusion Criteria
- •no french language
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Change from baseline IPQR (Illness Perception Questionnaire) score at 3 months
Time Frame: 3 months after intervention
Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQR) There is no total score for IPQR Nine subscales are reported for IPQR. High scores on the identity, timeline, consequences, and cyclical dimensions represent strongly held beliefs about the number of symptoms attributed to the illness, the chronicity of the condition, the negative consequences of the illness, and the cyclical nature of the condition. High scores on the personal control, treatment control and coherence dimensions, represent positive beliefs about the controllability of the illness and a personal understanding of the condition. Minimal and maximal score are respectively 0 and 14 for identity, 0 and 30 for timeline, consequences, personal control, and emotional representations, 0 and 25 for treatment control and illness coherence illness, 0-20 for timeline cyclical
Secondary Outcomes
- comparison of the two groups concerning answers to qualitative interviews at T 3 months after the intervention(3 months after intervention)