MedPath

a Study of QL1706 or QL1604 in Patients With Limited-stage Small Cell Lung Cancer After Chemoradiotherapy.

Phase 3
Not yet recruiting
Conditions
Small-cell Lung Cancer
Interventions
Drug: Iparomlimab and Tuvonralimab (QL1706)
Drug: placebo for QL1604
Drug: placebo for Iparomlimab and Tuvonralimab (QL1706)
Registration Number
NCT06789796
Lead Sponsor
Qilu Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
Brief Summary

The study is being conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of QL1706 versus QL1604 monotherapy as consolidation treatment in patients with limited-stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC) who have not experienced disease progression after concurrent or sequential chemoradiotherapy.

QL1706 (Iparomlimab and Tuvonralimab) is a single bifunctional MabPair product against PD-1 and CTLA-4. QL1604 is a monoclonal antibody against PD-1.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
636
Inclusion Criteria
  • The patient must be aged between 18 and 75 years (inclusive of boundary values), and both males and females are eligible.
  • Pathologically confirmed LS-SCLC [I-III stage SCLC (any T, any N, M0)], according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC, 8th edition) staging manual.
  • Received 4 cycles of chemotherapy concurrent or sequential with radiotherapy. Chemotherapy must contain platinum and etoposide. Radiotherapy must be either total 60-70 Gy over 6 weeks for the QD regimen or total 45 Gy over 3 weeks for BID schedules.
  • Patients must have achieved a complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD) after receiving curative platinum-based CRT and must not have developed progressive disease (PD) prior to study entry.
Exclusion Criteria
  • Mixed SCLC and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
  • Extensive-stage SCLC.
  • Active or prior documented autoimmune or inflammatory disorders.
  • Received other chemotherapy regimens besides etoposide and platinum-based therapy.
  • Active or prior documented autoimmune or inflammatory disorders.
  • Presence of interstitial lung disease or active non-infectious pneumonia (excluding grade 1 radiation pneumonitis not treated with corticosteroids).

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
QL1706 groupIparomlimab and Tuvonralimab (QL1706)Iparomlimab and Tuvonralimab + placebo for QL1604, intravenous infusion (IV), every 3 weeks
QL1706 groupplacebo for QL1604Iparomlimab and Tuvonralimab + placebo for QL1604, intravenous infusion (IV), every 3 weeks
QL1604 groupQL1604QL1604 + placebo for Iparomlimab and Tuvonralimab, IV, every 3 weeks
QL1604 groupplacebo for Iparomlimab and Tuvonralimab (QL1706)QL1604 + placebo for Iparomlimab and Tuvonralimab, IV, every 3 weeks
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Progression-free survival (PFS)up to 2 years

To compare and evaluate the efficacy of QL1706 versus QL1604 as consolidation therapy after chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for patients with LS-SCLC as measured by Blinded Independent Review Committee (BIRC)-assessed PFS

Overall survival (OS)up to 5 years

To compare and evaluate the efficacy of QL1706 versus QL1604 as consolidation therapy after CRT for patients with LS-SCLC as measured by OS

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
objective response rate (ORR)up to 2 years

To compare and evaluate the efficacy of QL1706 versus QL1604 as consolidation therapy after CRT for patients with LS-SCLC as measured by ORR

disease control rate (DCR)up to 2 years

To compare and evaluate the efficacy of QL1706 versus QL1604 as consolidation therapy after CRT for patients with LS-SCLC as measured by DCR

duration of response (DoR)up to 2 years

To compare and evaluate the efficacy of QL1706 versus QL1604 as consolidation therapy after CRT for patients with LS-SCLC as measured by DoR

PFSup to 2 years

To compare and evaluate the efficacy of QL1706 versus QL1604 as consolidation therapy after CRT for patients with LS-SCLC as measured by Investigator-assessed PFS

1-year OS rateup to 1 year

To compare and evaluate the efficacy of QL1706 versus QL1604 as consolidation therapy after CRT for patients with LS-SCLC as measured by 1-year OS rate

2-year OS rateup to 2 years

To compare and evaluate the efficacy of QL1706 versus QL1604 as consolidation therapy after CRT for patients with LS-SCLC as measured by 2-year OS rate

adverse eventsup to 2 years

To compare and evaluate the safety of QL1706 versus QL1604 as consolidation therapy after CRT for patients with LS-SCLC as measured by the incidence of adverse events (Percentage of participants with treatment-related adverse events as assessed by CTCAEv5.0.) and abnormal laboratory parameters.

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath