a Study of QL1706 or QL1604 in Patients With Limited-stage Small Cell Lung Cancer After Chemoradiotherapy.
- Conditions
- Small-cell Lung Cancer
- Interventions
- Drug: Iparomlimab and Tuvonralimab (QL1706)Drug: placebo for QL1604Drug: placebo for Iparomlimab and Tuvonralimab (QL1706)
- Registration Number
- NCT06789796
- Lead Sponsor
- Qilu Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
- Brief Summary
The study is being conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of QL1706 versus QL1604 monotherapy as consolidation treatment in patients with limited-stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC) who have not experienced disease progression after concurrent or sequential chemoradiotherapy.
QL1706 (Iparomlimab and Tuvonralimab) is a single bifunctional MabPair product against PD-1 and CTLA-4. QL1604 is a monoclonal antibody against PD-1.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- NOT_YET_RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 636
- The patient must be aged between 18 and 75 years (inclusive of boundary values), and both males and females are eligible.
- Pathologically confirmed LS-SCLC [I-III stage SCLC (any T, any N, M0)], according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC, 8th edition) staging manual.
- Received 4 cycles of chemotherapy concurrent or sequential with radiotherapy. Chemotherapy must contain platinum and etoposide. Radiotherapy must be either total 60-70 Gy over 6 weeks for the QD regimen or total 45 Gy over 3 weeks for BID schedules.
- Patients must have achieved a complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD) after receiving curative platinum-based CRT and must not have developed progressive disease (PD) prior to study entry.
- Mixed SCLC and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
- Extensive-stage SCLC.
- Active or prior documented autoimmune or inflammatory disorders.
- Received other chemotherapy regimens besides etoposide and platinum-based therapy.
- Active or prior documented autoimmune or inflammatory disorders.
- Presence of interstitial lung disease or active non-infectious pneumonia (excluding grade 1 radiation pneumonitis not treated with corticosteroids).
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description QL1706 group Iparomlimab and Tuvonralimab (QL1706) Iparomlimab and Tuvonralimab + placebo for QL1604, intravenous infusion (IV), every 3 weeks QL1706 group placebo for QL1604 Iparomlimab and Tuvonralimab + placebo for QL1604, intravenous infusion (IV), every 3 weeks QL1604 group QL1604 QL1604 + placebo for Iparomlimab and Tuvonralimab, IV, every 3 weeks QL1604 group placebo for Iparomlimab and Tuvonralimab (QL1706) QL1604 + placebo for Iparomlimab and Tuvonralimab, IV, every 3 weeks
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Progression-free survival (PFS) up to 2 years To compare and evaluate the efficacy of QL1706 versus QL1604 as consolidation therapy after chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for patients with LS-SCLC as measured by Blinded Independent Review Committee (BIRC)-assessed PFS
Overall survival (OS) up to 5 years To compare and evaluate the efficacy of QL1706 versus QL1604 as consolidation therapy after CRT for patients with LS-SCLC as measured by OS
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method objective response rate (ORR) up to 2 years To compare and evaluate the efficacy of QL1706 versus QL1604 as consolidation therapy after CRT for patients with LS-SCLC as measured by ORR
disease control rate (DCR) up to 2 years To compare and evaluate the efficacy of QL1706 versus QL1604 as consolidation therapy after CRT for patients with LS-SCLC as measured by DCR
duration of response (DoR) up to 2 years To compare and evaluate the efficacy of QL1706 versus QL1604 as consolidation therapy after CRT for patients with LS-SCLC as measured by DoR
PFS up to 2 years To compare and evaluate the efficacy of QL1706 versus QL1604 as consolidation therapy after CRT for patients with LS-SCLC as measured by Investigator-assessed PFS
1-year OS rate up to 1 year To compare and evaluate the efficacy of QL1706 versus QL1604 as consolidation therapy after CRT for patients with LS-SCLC as measured by 1-year OS rate
2-year OS rate up to 2 years To compare and evaluate the efficacy of QL1706 versus QL1604 as consolidation therapy after CRT for patients with LS-SCLC as measured by 2-year OS rate
adverse events up to 2 years To compare and evaluate the safety of QL1706 versus QL1604 as consolidation therapy after CRT for patients with LS-SCLC as measured by the incidence of adverse events (Percentage of participants with treatment-related adverse events as assessed by CTCAEv5.0.) and abnormal laboratory parameters.
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.