Equivalence Among Antiepileptic Drug Generic and Brand Products in People With Epilepsy: Single-Dose 6-Period Replicate Design (EQUIGEN Single-Dose Study)
试验速览
- 阶段
- 4 期
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 54
- 试验地点
- 8
- 主要终点
- Bioequivalence for generic 1 compared to generic 2
研究概览
简要总结
The United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has specific rules which generic drug companies must follow to get a generic copy of a seizure medication approved. Currently, FDA approves generic drugs by requiring studies on normal volunteers who don't have epilepsy and who take just one dose of the generic drug followed by a series of blood tests. Some people with epilepsy and their physicians have complained about side effects or loss of seizure control when taking generic drugs, but no one knows if these complaints are truly because of problems with the generic drugs.
This research is to determine whether several different generic versions and the brand version of the medication lamotrigine perform in a similar way when given to people with epilepsy.
The study drug Lamictal® (lamotrigine) and both of the generic forms of lamotrigine to be tested are approved by the FDA for the treatment of seizures.
详细描述
The study proposed in this protocol will determine if bioequivalence testing performed for the FDA translates into similar bioequivalence in a population of people with epilepsy when switching among different generics of the anti-epileptic drug (AED). Based on a variety of pharmacokinetic (PK) data and clinical reports of concern, the example anti epilepsy drug (AED) used for this study will be lamotrigine (LTG).
In this single dose study, people with epilepsy taking AEDs, but not currently taking the test medication, lamotrigine, will be studied. We will use an order-randomized three-sequence six-period replicate design with the two most disparate generics studied in two replicate periods each and the brand (reference) product studied in two additional periods. A standard single dose of the test drug (lamotrigine 25mg) will be administered under controlled conditions (fasting with subsequent standardized meals) with a 12-hour in-facility blood sample collection followed by a collection every 24 hours for a total of a 96 hour sample collection that will be used to establish the pharmacokinetic measures of Cmax, AUC96 and AUC∞. Each period will be separated by at least a 12 day washout interval.
The replicate studies will be used to determine the intra-individual variability of the pharmacokinetic responses of the brand and the two generic products, as well as subject-by-formulation interaction variances. The data will also be used to calculate simultaneously all parameters that are needed to compare the 3 products in average and individual bioequivalence and outlier analyses. The differences between the disparate generics will be used to establish if the current standards translate to equivalence within the limits of the brand intra-subject variation.
The factors we will use to determine the most disparate generics include the results from the in vivo data from the ABE studies submitted to the FDA in the ANDA and in vitro chemical assay (potency) and dissolution data performed on several currently available lots. The intent is to study the specific lot of the generic product predicted to result in the lowest levels and compare it to the specific lot from another generic product predicted to result in the highest levels. Similarly, if multiple lots of the brand products are available, we will perform in vitro testing to establish the most desirable lot to study.
Factors that alter metabolism, including concomitant AEDs that may have hepatic enzyme induction effects will be tracked but not excluded, as long as the dose remains constant, as the goal is to reproduce the 'real life' situation as closely as possible within the practical limits of funding and study size. Subjects receiving valproate as concomitant medication will be excluded because the prolongation of half life would not allow LTG to reliably be completely cleared by 13 days. The criteria that establish an enriched population will also be tracked and used in a secondary analysis, but will not be used as an inclusion requirement. The enriched population is defined as people who experienced an otherwise unexplained increase in seizures or adverse effects, or a substantial change in AED level after a switch in AED products.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Crossover
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- 未提供
排除标准
- 未提供
研究组 & 干预措施
Generic A - Generic B - Brand - Generic A - Brand - Generic B
Sequence 1
干预措施: Lamotrigine Generic "A" Lamotrigine Generic "B" Lamotrigine "Brand" (Drug)
Generic A - Generic B - Brand - Generic A - Brand - Generic B
Sequence 1
干预措施: lamotrigine (Drug)
Generic B - Brand - Generic A - Generic B - Generic A - Brand
Sequence 2
干预措施: Lamotrigine Generic "A" Lamotrigine Generic "B" Lamotrigine "Brand" (Drug)
Generic B - Brand - Generic A - Generic B - Generic A - Brand
Sequence 2
干预措施: lamotrigine (Drug)
Brand - Generic A - Generic B - Brand - Generic B- Generic A
Sequence 3
干预措施: Lamotrigine Generic "A" Lamotrigine Generic "B" Lamotrigine "Brand" (Drug)
Brand - Generic A - Generic B - Brand - Generic B- Generic A
Sequence 3
干预措施: lamotrigine (Drug)
结局指标
主要结局
Bioequivalence for generic 1 compared to generic 2
时间窗: 18 months
To determine if Cmax or AUC are significantly different in the high generic product compared to the low generic product taking one as the reference and the other as the test product. Bioequivalence will be established per the current FDA ABE criteria if the 90% confidence interval of the geometric mean of Cmax and AUC for the high generic product compared to the low generic product are entirely within the 80%-125% range using the two one-sided standard analyses
次要结局
- Intra-subject variances(18 months)
研究者
Michael Privitera
Director Cincinnati Epilepsy Center
University of Cincinnati
