LMA Protector Cuff Pilot vs LMA Supreme Among Anaesthetised, Non-Paralysed Patients
- Conditions
- Anesthesia
- Interventions
- Device: LMA SupremeDevice: LMA Protector Cuff Pilot
- Registration Number
- NCT03984032
- Lead Sponsor
- Liu Chian Yong
- Brief Summary
Comparison of clinical performance between LMA Protector Cuff Pilot and LMA Supreme in terms of oropharyngeal leak pressure, time to insertion, ease of gastric tube insertion, laryngeal view, incidence of sore throat
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 60
- Patients planned for general anaesthesia without muscle relaxant usage via supraglottic airway device.
- BMI > 35
- Patients with likelihood of difficult intubation (Simplified Airway Risk Index Score of 4 or more)
- Patients with increased risks of aspirations (gastrooesophageal reflux disease, obstetric patients, hiatus hernia)
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description LMA Protector Cuff Pilot LMA Supreme - LMA Supreme LMA Protector Cuff Pilot -
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP) During induction of anaesthesia To assess the OLP of LMA Protector Cuff Pilot and LMA Supreme
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Mean time to insertion During induction of anaesthesia To compare mean time to insertion of LMA Protector Cuff Pilot and LMA Supreme
Laryngeal view After induction of anaesthesia To compare the laryngeal view between LMA Protector Cuff Pilot and LMA Supreme
Gastric tube insertion After induction of anaesthesia To compare the ease of gastric tube insertion in LMA Protector Cuff Pilot and LMA Supreme
Complications 24 hours To compare the incidence of sore throat and hoarseness of voice after insertion of LMA Protector Cuff Pilot and LMA Supreme
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre
🇲🇾Kuala Lumpur, Wilayah Persekutuan, Malaysia