跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT00939107
NCT00939107已完成不适用

The Effect of the McKenzie Method as Compared With That of Manipulation When Applied Adjunctive to Information and Advice for Patients With Clinical Signs of Disc-related Chronic Low Back Pain: Randomized Controlled Trial.

Back and Rehabilitation Center, Copenhagen2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 350 人开始时间: 2003年9月1日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
350
试验地点
2
主要终点
Disability

研究概览

简要总结

Introduction:

The McKenzie method as well as spinal manipulation is commonly used for the treatment of low back pain throughout the western world. Recently, the need for studies testing the effect of treatment strategies to specific diagnostic subgroups of patients has been emphasized. The present study aims to compare the effectiveness of the McKenzie method and chiropractic manipulation, information, and advice for patients with clinical signs of persistent symptoms originating from a diskus in the low back.

Methods:

After clinical screening 350 patients with or without leg pain who presented with centralization of symptoms or signs of disc herniation were randomized to the McKenzie group or the manipulation group. The outcome measures, Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire, 11 point numerical pain scale, 6 point global perceived change scale, and quality of life (Short Form-36) were assessed at baseline, at end of treatment, and at 2 and 12 months follow-up.

详细描述

In 1998, Cherkin et al. published a study showing no difference between outcomes following the McKenzie method, chiropractic manipulation, or the provision of an educational booklet for the treatment of patients with acute non-specific low back pain. Recently, the need for studies testing the effect of treatment strategies to specific diagnostic subgroups of patients has been emphasized. The present study aims to compare the effectiveness of the McKenzie method and chiropractic manipulation, information, and advice for patients with clinical signs of disc-related symptoms for duration of more than 6 Weeks.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Factorial
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Double (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 60 Years(Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • 18 to 60 years of age
  • suffering from low back pain (LBP) with or without leg pain for a period of more than 6 weeks
  • able to speak and understand the Danish language
  • with a presentation of clinical signs of disc-related symptoms.

排除标准

  • positive non-organic signs
  • serious pathology suspected based on physical examination and/or magnetic resonance imaging
  • application for disability pension or pending litigation
  • pregnancy
  • comorbidity
  • recent back surgery
  • problems with communication

结局指标

主要结局

Disability

时间窗: two months after treatment

Problems performing daily activities measured on the 23-item modified Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (worst: 23 points, best:0 points).

Number of Patients With Treatment Success

时间窗: Two months posttreatment

Treatment success was defined as a reduction of at least 5 points or an absolute score below 5 points on the 23-item modified Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (best value: 0 points, worst value 23 points)

次要结局

  • Pain(twelve months posttreatment)
  • Number of Patients on Sick Leave(twelve months posttreatment)
  • Quality of Life(twelve months posttreatment)
  • Cost Effectiveness(twelve months posttreatment)

研究者

发起方
Back and Rehabilitation Center, Copenhagen
申办方类型
Other Gov

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验