Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block Versus Low Dose Propofol to Achieve Painless Sitting Position Before Spinal Anesthesia in Patients With Hip Fractures
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 尚未招募
- 入组人数
- 60
- 主要终点
- The difference in VAS scale
研究概览
简要总结
The study will compare the efficacy of Pericapsular nerve group block (PENG) versus low dose Propofol for the achievement of painless sitting position before spinal anesthesia in patients undergoing repair of Hip fractures.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Prevention
- 盲法
- Triple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator)
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 40 Years 至 70 Years（Adult, Older Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •All patients in the age group ranging 40-70, both genders, belonging to physical status American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) I and II
排除标准
- •Patients with old fractures (more than 7 days), polytrauma, bleeding disorders or coagulopathy, local site infection, difficulty expressing pain scores such as hearing disability, mentally challenged, dementia or psychiatric illness and who refused to take part
研究组 & 干预措施
Group A
Group (A ) : will receive ultrasound guided pericapsular nerve group block (PENG) followed by spinal anesthesia.
干预措施: pericapsular nerve group block for group A,low dose intravenous Propofol [0.7mg/kg] over 30 seconds for group B (Procedure)
Group B
Group B will receive low dose intravenous Propofol [0.7mg/kg] over 30 seconds followed by spinal anesthesia and so far, this is the most common and standard technique to achieve sitting position during spinal anesthesia for patients with hip fractures.
干预措施: pericapsular nerve group block for group A,low dose intravenous Propofol [0.7mg/kg] over 30 seconds for group B (Procedure)
结局指标
主要结局
The difference in VAS scale
时间窗: 30 min after giving propofol and the PENG block.
The primary outcome will be difference in median reduction in VAS-D .
次要结局
未报告次要终点
研究者
Marwa Emam
Lecturer
Ain Shams University