MedPath

Pregnancy Outcomes With a GnRH Antagonist Protocol Versus GnRH-Agonist Protocol in ICSI Cycles

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Infertility
Registration Number
NCT00485537
Lead Sponsor
Clinic and Research Center in Human Reproduction Roger Abdelmassih
Brief Summary

Cycles with GnRH agonist and GnRH antagonist were compared and main outcome measures were the number of oocytes retrieved, injected and fertilized, embryos transferred, and clinical pregnancy and miscarriage rates, were analized.

Detailed Description

160 women were equally divided between a GnRH antagonist protocol (Group 1) versus a GnRH agonist protocol (Group 2) in ICSI cycles. The trial was conducted between September 2005 and December 2006. The mean age in both groups was 32 (range 22-40). The main outcome measures were the number of oocytes retrieved, injected and fertilized, embryos transferred, and clinical pregnancy and miscarriage rates.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
Female
Target Recruitment
2005
Inclusion Criteria
  • Infertility couples, absence of endometriosis (confirmed by a previous surgical procedure to investigate infertility), polycystic ovarian syndrome, FSH levels < 12 IU/l, basal levels of estradiol < 20 in the group submitted to the agonist protocol and beginning of stimulation on day 2 in group submitted to antagonist protocol, in the absence of ovarian cysts on the endovaginal ultrasound
Exclusion Criteria
  • use of exogenous LH during stimulation

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Comparative response to ICSI cycles with GnRH agosnist and cetrotide16 months
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Compare number of oocytes retrieved, injected and fertilized, embryos transferred, and clinical pregnancy and miscarriage rates in both groups16 months

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Clinica e Centro de Reprodução Humana Roger Abdelmassih

🇧🇷

São Paulo, SP, Brazil

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath