Evaluation of the Physiotherapy with Cycle Ergometer in the Funcional Recovery after Cardiac Surgery

Not Applicable

• Conditions: Heart Failure, Unstable Angina, Coronary Disease.; C14.280.434; C10.597.617.192.500.150; C14.280.647.250

• Registration Number: RBR-8ysb3n
• Lead Sponsor: Hospital Santa Izabel - Santa Casa de Misericórdia da Bahia

Brief Summary

Not available

Detailed Description

Not available

Study Timeline

• Results First Posted: 1900-01-01
• Study Start: 2018-05-22
• Last Update Posted: 29 May 2023

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: Data analysis completed
• Sex: Not specified
• Target Recruitment: Not specified

Inclusion Criteria

Patients of both sexes; aged 18 or older; admitted to the ICU and underwent coronary artery bypass graft surgery and / or valve replacement.

Exclusion Criteria

Patients with change of the level of consciousness; motor- or neurological impairment; with persistent hemodynamic instability.

Study & Design

• Study Type: Intervention
• Study Design: Not specified

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Presentation of the expected outcome 1: difference in functional, by mean values of the walking speed from the finding of the difference of, at least, the 0.1m/s between the groups. The walking speed was evaluated after the intervention of the groups Cycle and Control (active kinesiotherapy). after discharge from the ICU.;Presentation of the outcome found 1: the walking speed averages were similar between group.(0,47 ± 0,21 in Cycle group; versus 0.44 ± 0.23m/s; P=0.34).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Expected outcome 1: Reduction of 5% of length of stay hospital in the Group Cycle in relation to the Control group. Data evaluated through the electronic medical record after discharge.;Outcome found 1: There was no difference in length of stay hospital between groups. The group Cycle presented a median of 9(7-15)days and 9(7;17)days for the Control group, p=0,66.;Expected outcome 2: Comparison of walking speed betweem active and sedentary people in each group. IPAQ - International Pysical Activity Questionnaire. Short version ;Outcome found 2: There was no difference in the walking speed in the group Control (0.46 ± 0.23m/s for active and 0.41 ± 0.24m/s for sedentary; p=0.36). In Cycle group, active patients presented walking speed superior to the sedentary(0.52 ± 0.24m/s versus 0.41 ± 0.15m/s, p=0.01).