A randomized controlled study to compare effectiveness of Erector spinae plane block versus caudal block for postoperative analgesia in pediatric inguinal hernia surgery under general anesthesia
试验速览
- 阶段
- 2/3 期
- 状态
- 尚未招募
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 105
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Mean FLACC pain score in first 24 hrs
研究概览
简要总结
Inguinal herniotomy is a commonly performed day care procedure in pediatric patients and post operative analgesia is crucial for peri operative care. Failure to adequately control post operative pain can lead to negative behavioral changes and parental dissatisfaction.
Caudal block is the gold standard for pain management in children undergoing lower abdominal surgeries due to its enhanced reliability and safety profile. However a notable drawback of this technique is its limited duration of action following single injection. Thus several interfacial plane blocks have been suggested as alternatives for postoperative analgesia in children including quadratus lumborum block, transverse abdominis plane block,rectus sheath block and Erector spinae plane block
The USG guided Erector spinae plane block is gaining popularity in pediatrics due to its potential for managing post operative pain in various surgeries as it is relatively easy to perform with no complications.
We plan to conduct this double blind randomised controlled study to compare the effectiveness of Erector spinae plane block versus Caudal block for post-operative analgesia in children undergoing inguinal hernia repair.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 盲法
- Double
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 2.00 Year(s) 至 5.00 Year(s)(—)
- 性别
- All
入选标准
- •Children undergoing elective unilateral hernia repair Patients belonging to ASA grade I and II Children of either sex children of 10 to 25 kg body weight Guardian willing to give consent.
排除标准
- •Children with a history of allergy to local anaesthetics Children undergoing bilateral inguinal hernia surgeries Local infection at the proposed site of block Children with bleeding or coagulation disorders Children with anatomical abnormalities of the spine.
结局指标
主要结局
Mean FLACC pain score in first 24 hrs
时间窗: 30 minutes | 1 hour | 2 hours | 4 hours | 6 hours | 8 hours | 12 hours | 24 hours
Mean Time to first rescue analgesia
时间窗: 30 minutes | 1 hour | 2 hours | 4 hours | 6 hours | 8 hours | 12 hours | 24 hours
Mean number of rescue analgesia in first 24 hours
时间窗: 30 minutes | 1 hour | 2 hours | 4 hours | 6 hours | 8 hours | 12 hours | 24 hours
Mean change in hemodyanamic parameters
时间窗: 30 minutes | 1 hour | 2 hours | 4 hours | 6 hours | 8 hours | 12 hours | 24 hours
Side effects if any
时间窗: 30 minutes | 1 hour | 2 hours | 4 hours | 6 hours | 8 hours | 12 hours | 24 hours
次要结局
未报告次要终点
研究者
Dr Neelam Dogra
SMS MEDICAL COLLEGE AND HOSPITAL
