MedPath

Mini Stem DEXA (Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry)

Completed
Conditions
Osteoarthritis, Hip
Registration Number
NCT01066936
Lead Sponsor
Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Brief Summary

The objective of this study is to evaluate the bone ingrowth after implantation of the study device. This study will also document any device-related surgical complications or adverse radiographic observations. Improvement in pain, function, and health economic data will be compared with improvements documented with other joint systems.

Detailed Description

The purpose of the current investigation is to assess the bone ingrowth after implantation with a modular, short hip stem using Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DEXA). The intended use of this product is for patients with non-inflammatory and inflammatory degenerative joint disease who require a primary total hip replacement.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
20
Inclusion Criteria
  • Patient has hip disease that requires a total hip arthroplasty.
  • Patient is willing to consent to participate in the study.
  • Patient plans to be available for the study duration.
  • Patient is in stable health and is free of or treated and stabilized for cardiac, pulmonary, hematological, or other conditions that would pose excessive operative risk.
Exclusion Criteria
  • Patient known to have insufficient bone stock.
  • Patient has had major non-arthroscopic surgery to the study hip.
  • Patient has physical, emotional or neurological conditions that would compromise the patient's compliance with postoperative rehabilitation and follow-up.
  • Patient has a known sensitivity to materials in the device.

Study & Design

Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Design
Not specified
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
DEXA Analysis of BMD at Preoperative VisitPreoperative

DEXA=Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry; BMD=Bone Mineral Density; The proximal femur was divided into 7 regions relative to the length of the stem. Lateral portions = region 1, region 2 and region 3; The entire bone mass immediately distal to the stem tip = region 4; Medial portions = region 5, region 6, and region 7. Mean BMD was calculated for each femoral region. BMD values were adjusted peri-prosthetically to account for stem area.

DEXA Analysis of BMD at 6 Months6 Months

DEXA=Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry; BMD=Bone Mineral Density; The proximal femur was divided into 7 regions relative to the length of the stem. Lateral portions = region 1, region 2 and region 3; The entire bone mass immediately distal to the stem tip = region 4; Medial portions = region 5, region 6, and region 7. Mean BMD was calculated for each femoral region. BMD values were adjusted peri-prosthetically to account for stem area.

DEXA Analysis of BMD at 1 Year1 Year

DEXA=Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry; BMD=Bone Mineral Density; The proximal femur was divided into 7 regions relative to the length of the stem. Lateral portions = region 1, region 2 and region 3; The entire bone mass immediately distal to the stem tip = region 4; Medial portions = region 5, region 6, and region 7. Mean BMD was calculated for each femoral region. BMD values were adjusted peri-prosthetically to account for stem area.

DEXA Analysis of BMD at 2 Years2 Year

DEXA=Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry; BMD=Bone Mineral Density; The proximal femur was divided into 7 regions relative to the length of the stem. Lateral portions = region 1, region 2 and region 3; The entire bone mass immediately distal to the stem tip = region 4; Medial portions = region 5, region 6, and region 7. Mean BMD was calculated for each femoral region. BMD values were adjusted peri-prosthetically to account for stem area.

DEXA Analysis of BMD at 3 Months3 Months

DEXA=Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry; BMD=Bone Mineral Density; The proximal femur was divided into 7 regions relative to the length of the stem. Lateral portions = region 1, region 2 and region 3; The entire bone mass immediately distal to the stem tip = region 4; Medial portions = region 5, region 6, and region 7. Mean BMD was calculated for each femoral region. BMD values were adjusted peri-prosthetically to account for stem area.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Baseline Harris Hip Score (HHS) at Preoperative VisitPreoperative

The HHS is a physician tool to measure how a subject is doing following hip replacement surgery using the following scale:

Total Scale Ranges:

Excellent: 90 - 100 Good: 80 - 89 Fair: 70 - 79 Poor: 60 - 69 Very Poor: \<60

Subscore Ranges:

Pain: 0 - 44 Function: 0 - 47 Absence of Deformity: 0 - 4 Range of Motion: 0 - 5

The score ranges from 0 to 100, where, the higher the score, the better the subject outcome. Lower scores indicate a higher level of dysfunction due to hip problems.

Radiographic Assessment at 3 Month Visit (Yes/No Components)3 Months

Radiographs were obtained from the anteroposterior (AP) view as well as the lateral view. The span of the bone-prosthesis interface for each component was broken down into zone systems. The scoring system was based on the measurement of radiolucent lines (in millimeters) in each zone. The checklist reviewed radiolucencies, migration, osteolysis, and stress shielding.

The Brooker Classification was defined as:

Class 0 - absence of radiographic heterotopic ossification Class 1 - islands of bone within soft tissues Class 2 - bone spurs originating from pelvis or proximal end of femur with at least 1 cm between opposing bone surfaces Class 3 - bone spurs originating from pelvis or proximal end of femur reduced to \<1 cm Class 4 - apparent bone ankyloses of the hip

Radiographic Assessment at Discharge VisitDischarge

Radiographs were obtained from the anteroposterior (AP) view as well as the lateral view.

Harris Hip Score (HHS) at 3 Month Visit3 Month

The HHS is a physician tool to measure how a subject is doing following hip replacement surgery using the following scale:

Total Scale Ranges:

Excellent: 90 - 100 Good: 80 - 89 Fair: 70 - 79 Poor: 60 - 69 Very Poor: \<60

Subscore Ranges:

Pain: 0 - 44 Function: 0 - 47 Absence of Deformity: 0 - 4 Range of Motion: 0 - 5

The score ranges from 0 to 100, where, the higher the score, the better the subject outcome. Lower scores indicate a higher level of dysfunction due to hip problems.

Hip Injury Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) at 5 Year Visit5 Years

The HOOS is a questionnaire that the subject completes focusing on hip pain, stiffness, and function relating to osteoarthritis of the hip. The HOOS consists of 40 items assessing 5 subscales. The 5 separate patient-relevant dimensions are Symptoms and Stiffness, Pain, Function in Daily Living, Function in Sport and Recreation, and Hip-Related Quality of Life (QoL).

Pain includes 10 items with a total score of 0 - 100 points Symptoms includes 5 items with a total score of 0 - 100 points Function in Daily Living includes 17 items with a total score of 0 - 100 points Function in Sport and Recreation and Hip-Related QoL each include 4 items with a total score of 0 - 100 points.

Each sub-score was transformed in a worst to best scale (0-100), where 100 indicates no symptoms and 0 indicates extreme symptoms.

Radiographic Assessment at 3 Month Visit3 Months

Radiographs were obtained from the anteroposterior (AP) view as well as the lateral view.

Radiographic Assessment at 5 Year Visit5 Year

Radiographs were obtained from the anteroposterior (AP) view as well as the lateral view.

Radiographic Assessment at 3 Month Visit (Neutral/Valgus Component)3 Months

Radiographs were obtained from the anteroposterior (AP) view as well as the lateral view.

Harris Hip Score (HHS) at 6 Month Visit6 Months

The HHS is a physician tool to measure how a subject is doing following hip replacement surgery using the following scale:

Total Scale Ranges:

Excellent: 90 - 100 Good: 80 - 89 Fair: 70 - 79 Poor: 60 - 69 Very Poor: \<60

Subscore Ranges:

Pain: 0 - 44 Function: 0 - 47 Absence of Deformity: 0 - 4 Range of Motion: 0 - 5

The score ranges from 0 to 100, where, the higher the score, the better the subject outcome. Lower scores indicate a higher level of dysfunction due to hip problems.

Harris Hip Score (HHS) at 5 Year Visit5 Year

The HHS is a physician tool to measure how a subject is doing following hip replacement surgery using the following scale:

Total Scale Ranges:

Excellent: 90 - 100 Good: 80 - 89 Fair: 70 - 79 Poor: 60 - 69 Very Poor: \<60

Subscore Ranges:

Pain: 0 - 44 Function: 0 - 47 Absence of Deformity: 0 - 4 Range of Motion: 0 - 5

The score ranges from 0 to 100, where, the higher the score, the better the subject outcome. Lower scores indicate a higher level of dysfunction due to hip problems.

Hip Injury Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) at Preoperative VisitPreoperative

The HOOS is a questionnaire that the subject completes focusing on hip pain, stiffness, and function relating to osteoarthritis of the hip. The HOOS consists of 40 items assessing 5 subscales. The 5 separate patient-relevant dimensions are Symptoms and Stiffness, Pain, Function in Daily Living, Function in Sport and Recreation, and Hip-Related Quality of Life (QoL).

Pain includes 10 items with a total score of 0 - 100 points Symptoms includes 5 items with a total score of 0 - 100 points Function in Daily Living includes 17 items with a total score of 0 - 100 points Function in Sport and Recreation and Hip-Related QoL each include 4 items with a total score of 0 - 100 points.

Each sub-score was transformed in a worst to best scale (0-100), where 100 indicates no symptoms and 0 indicates extreme symptoms.

Hip Injury Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) at 2 Year Visit2 Years

The HOOS is a questionnaire that the subject completes focusing on hip pain, stiffness, and function relating to osteoarthritis of the hip. The HOOS consists of 40 items assessing 5 subscales. The 5 separate patient-relevant dimensions are Symptoms and Stiffness, Pain, Function in Daily Living, Function in Sport and Recreation, and Hip-Related Quality of Life (QoL).

Pain includes 10 items with a total score of 0 - 100 points Symptoms includes 5 items with a total score of 0 - 100 points Function in Daily Living includes 17 items with a total score of 0 - 100 points Function in Sport and Recreation and Hip-Related QoL each include 4 items with a total score of 0 - 100 points.

Each sub-score was transformed in a worst to best scale (0-100), where 100 indicates no symptoms and 0 indicates extreme symptoms.

Harris Hip Score (HHS) at 2 Year Visit2 Years

The HHS is a physician tool to measure how a subject is doing following hip replacement surgery using the following scale:

Total Scale Ranges:

Excellent: 90 - 100 Good: 80 - 89 Fair: 70 - 79 Poor: 60 - 69 Very Poor: \<60

Subscore Ranges:

Pain: 0 - 44 Function: 0 - 47 Absence of Deformity: 0 - 4 Range of Motion: 0 - 5

The score ranges from 0 to 100, where, the higher the score, the better the subject outcome. Lower scores indicate a higher level of dysfunction due to hip problems.

Hip Injury Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) at 6 Month Visit6 Months

The HOOS is a questionnaire that the subject completes focusing on hip pain, stiffness, and function relating to osteoarthritis of the hip. The HOOS consists of 40 items assessing 5 subscales. The 5 separate patient-relevant dimensions are Symptoms and Stiffness, Pain, Function in Daily Living, Function in Sport and Recreation, and Hip-Related Quality of Life (QoL).

Pain includes 10 items with a total score of 0 - 100 points Symptoms includes 5 items with a total score of 0 - 100 points Function in Daily Living includes 17 items with a total score of 0 - 100 points Function in Sport and Recreation and Hip-Related QoL each include 4 items with a total score of 0 - 100 points.

Each sub-score was transformed in a worst to best scale (0-100), where 100 indicates no symptoms and 0 indicates extreme symptoms.

Radiographic Assessment at 5 Year Visit (Yes/No Components)5 Year

Radiographs were obtained from the anteroposterior (AP) view as well as the lateral view. The span of the bone-prosthesis interface for each component was broken down into zone systems. The scoring system was based on the measurement of radiolucent lines (in millimeters) in each zone. The checklist reviewed radiolucencies, migration, osteolysis, and stress shielding.

The Brooker Classification was defined as:

Class 0 - absence of radiographic heterotopic ossification Class 1 - islands of bone within soft tissues Class 2 - bone spurs originating from pelvis or proximal end of femur with at least 1 cm between opposing bone surfaces Class 3 - bone spurs originating from pelvis or proximal end of femur reduced to \<1 cm Class 4 - apparent bone ankyloses of the hip

Radiographic Assessment at 1 Year Visit1 Year

Radiographs were obtained from the anteroposterior (AP) view as well as the lateral view.

Harris Hip Score (HHS) at 1 Year Visit1 Year

The HHS is a physician tool to measure how a subject is doing following hip replacement surgery using the following scale:

Total Scale Ranges:

Excellent: 90 - 100 Good: 80 - 89 Fair: 70 - 79 Poor: 60 - 69 Very Poor: \<60

Subscore Ranges:

Pain: 0 - 44 Function: 0 - 47 Absence of Deformity: 0 - 4 Range of Motion: 0 - 5

The score ranges from 0 to 100, where, the higher the score, the better the subject outcome. Lower scores indicate a higher level of dysfunction due to hip problems.

Hip Injury Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) at 3 Month Visit3 Months

The HOOS is a questionnaire that the subject completes focusing on hip pain, stiffness, and function relating to osteoarthritis of the hip. The HOOS consists of 40 items assessing 5 subscales. The 5 separate patient-relevant dimensions are Symptoms and Stiffness, Pain, Function in Daily Living, Function in Sport and Recreation, and Hip-Related Quality of Life (QoL).

Pain includes 10 items with a total score of 0 - 100 points Symptoms includes 5 items with a total score of 0 - 100 points Function in Daily Living includes 17 items with a total score of 0 - 100 points Function in Sport and Recreation and Hip-Related QoL each include 4 items with a total score of 0 - 100 points.

Each sub-score was transformed in a worst to best scale (0-100), where 100 indicates no symptoms and 0 indicates extreme symptoms.

Hip Injury Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) at 1 Year Visit1 Year

The HOOS is a questionnaire that the subject completes focusing on hip pain, stiffness, and function relating to osteoarthritis of the hip. The HOOS consists of 40 items assessing 5 subscales. The 5 separate patient-relevant dimensions are Symptoms and Stiffness, Pain, Function in Daily Living, Function in Sport and Recreation, and Hip-Related Quality of Life (QoL).

Pain includes 10 items with a total score of 0 - 100 points Symptoms includes 5 items with a total score of 0 - 100 points Function in Daily Living includes 17 items with a total score of 0 - 100 points Function in Sport and Recreation and Hip-Related QoL each include 4 items with a total score of 0 - 100 points.

Each sub-score was transformed in a worst to best scale (0-100), where 100 indicates no symptoms and 0 indicates extreme symptoms.

Radiographic Assessment at 1 Year Visit (Yes/No Components)1 Year

Radiographs were obtained from the anteroposterior (AP) view as well as the lateral view. The span of the bone-prosthesis interface for each component was broken down into zone systems. The scoring system was based on the measurement of radiolucent lines (in millimeters) in each zone. The checklist reviewed radiolucencies, migration, osteolysis, and stress shielding.

The Brooker Classification was defined as:

Class 0 - absence of radiographic heterotopic ossification Class 1 - islands of bone within soft tissues Class 2 - bone spurs originating from pelvis or proximal end of femur with at least 1 cm between opposing bone surfaces Class 3 - bone spurs originating from pelvis or proximal end of femur reduced to \<1 cm Class 4 - apparent bone ankyloses of the hip

Radiographic Assessment at Discharge Visit (Neutral/Valgus Component)Discharge

Radiographs were obtained from the anteroposterior (AP) view as well as the lateral view.

Radiographic Assessment at 1 Year Visit (Neutral/Valgus Component)1 Year

Radiographs were obtained from the anteroposterior (AP) view as well as the lateral view.

Radiographic Assessment at Preoperative Visit (Yes/No Components)Discharge

Radiographs were obtained from the anteroposterior (AP) view as well as the lateral view. The span of the bone-prosthesis interface for each component was broken down into zone systems. The scoring system was based on the measurement of radiolucent lines (in millimeters) in each zone. The checklist reviewed radiolucencies, migration, osteolysis, and stress shielding.

The Brooker Classification was defined as:

Class 0 - absence of radiographic heterotopic ossification Class 1 - islands of bone within soft tissues Class 2 - bone spurs originating from pelvis or proximal end of femur with at least 1 cm between opposing bone surfaces Class 3 - bone spurs originating from pelvis or proximal end of femur reduced to \<1 cm Class 4 - apparent bone ankyloses of the hip

Radiographic Assessment at 5 Year Visit (Neutral/Valgus Component)5 Years

Radiographs were obtained from the anteroposterior (AP) view as well as the lateral view.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Malabar Orthopaedic Clinic

🇦🇺

Windsor, Australia

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath